Imagine the entire internet fitting into ONE (big) computer. That is IBM’s vision as defined in its Kittihawk Project. As for now, the biggest computer in the world is controlled by - you guessed it - Google. It assembles roughly a million of pizza-box-size PC, in dozens of datacenters across the world (this is called the “Cloud”). Works fine for you and me, but as viewed by IBM computer scientists, it is like building an electric power plant out of portable generators (unfair : computers can be programmed, generators can’t). Anyway, those clusters of cheap computers are extremely demanding in terms of power, cooling and interconnection. By comparison, one computer containing thousands, or even millions, of processors can do a better job more efficiently.
> see this white paper (at least he first half is accessible)
Related columns:
- Infrastructure — The thick computer cloud For each watt consumed in data processing (a search on the net for instance), another half watt is required for cooling the microprocessors. That explains Google’s race for cheap electricity. In
- “Cloud Computing is bad for you”… So says Richard Stallman the father of the Free Software Foundation. He makes a simple argument: By using Cloud Computing applications you surrender your life (data) to some big company you can’t t
- Caught Between The Desktop And The Cloud How would you like to be the head of Microsoft? Yesterday, you were the emperor of the desktop. Riding Moore’s Law, microprocessors doubling their power every 18 months, microcomputers became pe
- Technology / Multicore Processors: More is Better, Right? Lies, damned lies and benchmarks. So goes an old industry joke setting up an ascending order of offenses to the truth. Old joke but alive and well in the latest industry trend: the recourse to multic
- Microsoft mesh — Caught Between The Desktop And The Cloud, Part II: The Markitecture Solution Last week’s column asked how you’d like to be Microsoft’s CEO, caught between the aging desktop and the emerging cloud. How do you grab a significant (Microsoft likes “dominant
