Advertising: real change must happen

The brutal recession reveals how flawed the current Internet business model is. As advertising-only business models are falling apart, even the Google ecosphere is under stress. The search giant’s preservation of its margins at the expense of its media partners’ revenue stream could be shortsighted.  –First of two parts.

Sorry to be blunt, but Internet advertising sucks. Most campaigns are an incentive to install AdBlock software, the most popular Firefox plug-in (45m downloads in 3 years).  “Splash”, “pull-down”, “sliding block”, all sorts of ads suddenly invade your screen. They are nothing but a nuisance. If you’re fast enough, you close the ad before it finishes loading.  And we have the most irritating form of banners, the ones with the sound always loudly on when you inadvertently mouse-over over them.

These bad economic times do not improve this picture. Large, unsold inventories create endless repetitions of the same ads. Budget cuts discourage agency creativity and smart targeting is still underdeveloped. As I write this note, I visit a well-known French news site: after four seconds trying to read the lead article, five modules of all shapes and sizes occupy at least a third of the page, hiding part of the story. Last week, I performed a random test on friends and acquaintances who use Gmail: none of them remembered clicking on any text-ads, the ones supposedly relevant to the message they were working on.

An Internet user is exposed to more than 2000 ads a month, according to ComScore. The resulting situation is easily summed up: more ads at a lower price.

- Overall this year, we will see little volume growth, if any. In the US market last year, online ads grew by 10.6% for the full year, the worst performance since 2002. But growth slowed down to 2.6% for Q4 2008 (by comparison, Q4 2007 growth was +24%). And, last week, for 2009, Nielsen halved its prediction to 4.5%.

Prices and yields are falling. In the French market, for instance, big media sites I know of, were used to get a 10€ CPM (cost per thousand impressions) per module; now they only get 8€ or 7€. According to the marketing firm PubMatic, CPM decreased by 48% between Q4 2008 and Q4 2009.

- The share of ads dumped through networks is rising, especially within the cash-panicked news media sector. This year, many sites will dump about 50% of their unsold pages to ad networks at fire sale prices.  In France alone, 150 companies vie to sell your Internet ads, an inefficient and scattered market.

- Predictably, the click-through rate is not improving (except to close the window). Since the pay-for-performance ad segment is increasing, the poor click-through performance applies further downward pressure on prices.

Look at the pie chart below. It shows the distribution of ad types (source: IAB).

All three big components representing 80% of the revenue stream are in jeopardy or experiencing major shifts:
- Banner ads: they are shrinking for all the reasons stated above (poor creativity, random targeting) to the benefit of the search ads — I’ll come back to that later.
- Classifieds: significantly impacted by the economic downturn; in 2008, classifieds were already down 4% on the internet; expect worse in 2009. And, with the rise of free, Craigslist-like, classifieds, total market revenue will shrink dramatically (but nice margins are guaranteed for the survivors).
- Search is both the largest revenue format (it might count for more than 50% this year) and the fastest growing segment (+20% in 2008, twice the rate of the entire ad sector on the net). But this strong performance comes with declining prices and a growing imbalance in Google’s favor, at the expense of its partners (i.e. media sites).

The search ad segment is indisputably Google’s fiefdom. The Mountain View giant controls 70% of the business in the US alone, according to eMarketer. The percentage is higher in some European countries.  Whatever the metric or the region, Google does control the search ad market in terms of volume, price and technology (its ability to serve relevant ads to a large chunk of the 188 millions sites in operation worldwide).  The key figures are: in 2008, Google’s revenue was $21.8bn, operating income $6.6bn and net income $4.2bn. 51% of the revenue came from outside the United States.

The company draws its revenue from two main sources:
- Two-thirds come from the Ad Words system, in which brands buy keywords through a complex (and opaque) auction system under Google’s sole control. In return, the brand (an online business or a media) gets traffic it will monetize through advertising or e-commerce.  As an example: I manufacture hot air balloons; I buy — expensively if there are many bidders — the right keyword(s); each time someone searches for hot air balloons, my text-ad will appear on top of the results page. In the chart below, this is the Search (AdWords) line.
- A bit less than one-third comes from the AdSense program in which sites allow Google to fill boxes with text-ads in exchange of a fee repaid by Google to the host site.
in the chart below, this is the Network (AdSense) line.

Now let’s have a closer look at the trends, by the quarter:

We see three things:

  1. Of course, like everyone else in this recession, Google is feeling the pinch. For the last quarter of 2008 versus 2007, growth is “reduced” to +18%, to be compared to +51% between Q4 07 and Q4 06.
  2. Revenue streams show uneven growth: the biggest one, the AdWords system, representing 2/3 of Google revenue, still grows at +22%  for Q4 08 vs. Q4 07. For the Q4 06/07, the growth was +58%. This is the most controlled and obscure part of Google’s business. The search engine sets prices in a totally opaque way, by assigning a complex (and arbitrary) “Quality Score”. See The Register tech site for details.
  3. In the meantime, the revenue stream Google shares with partner sites (for instance media sites with tons of text-ads) is comparatively shrinking: only +3% in Q4 08 vs. a year before, a big drop from +37% between Q4 07 and Q4 06.

You get it: media are getting less and less advertising dollars and euros from Google. As many say, perhaps without realizing it, without intent, see the company’s Don’t Be Evil motto, Google is killing the golden goose as it preserves its fat (38%) operating margin. For many websites, especially small ones, working with The search engine becomes less attractive.

Is an alternative looming? Between the impenetrable alchemy of its keywords auction system and the shrinking revenue channeled back to its partners, even the very successful Google model needs to adjust to these difficult times.  —FF

Next week, How to reinvent a sustainable advertising model.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related columns:

  1. The Tectonic of Advertising TweetEvery year we see the same ritual : forecast, charts, predictions about the growth of the advertising market. For those who like charts and figures, go directly to the table below. For right-sided brains, let’s have a look at the underlying forces in play. They are quite interesting to watch, and they will have a [...]...
  2. Advertising: The trust Factor TweetThe digital advertising equation is outlined in the Nielsen graph below. The Global Trust in Advertising survey released this month (summary on Nielsen site and PDF here) underlines one key finding: For the vast majority of digital users, trust lies first and foremost in recommendations and opinions from their peers. As for the bulk of [...]...
  3. March 11, 2008 : a new era in the internet advertising sector TweetThe European Union had the power to prevent Google’s acquisition of DoubleClick. Last week, the regulator unwittingly set a milestone in the history of the Internet. They greenlighted Google’s absolute supremacy over Internet advertising, a position comparable to Microsoft’s domination of PC operating systems, Windows, and applications, Office. To get a fresh read of the [...]...
  4. McKinsey to the ad market: change and adapt TweetA McKinsey report quoted by Business Week predicts that “Traditional TV advertising will be one-third as effective in 2010 as it was in 1990.” Same, basically, for all kinds of passive advertising : people tend to pay less and less attention to displays, banners, inserts. The big shift is under way. > story in BW...
  5. Advertising (2): fixing an antique model TweetLast week, we addressed the demise of the ad-only model. Solutions won’t emerge overnight, all the more of a reason to start searching. Here are a few leads. (This is the second of two parts, the first one is here) The AdTech conference took place last week, in Paris; the mood there wasn’t exactly a [...]...

8 Comments

  1. Posted April 6, 2009 at 6:14 am | Permalink

    Good article, thanks!

  2. Posted April 10, 2009 at 3:31 am | Permalink

    Nice to meet you. I, GDI is working to sell the

    business domain. Very helpful article. So, please

    come to our HP.

  3. Posted July 12, 2010 at 4:43 am | Permalink

    Thank you for the link…

  4. Posted May 24, 2011 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    thank you for all this new and useful information, it will most certainly come in handy

  5. Posted November 20, 2011 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    http://www.ulzi.net/kava-passion-flower-and-amino-acids-effective-for-anxiety

  6. Posted March 7, 2013 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    Your own article has confirmed useful to myself. It’s
    extremely informative and you’re naturally extremely educated in this region. You have got opened my personal eye in order to numerous views on this particular matter together with intriquing, notable and reliable written content.

  7. Posted May 11, 2013 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    In case you choose cards, then there may be blackjack and
    baccarat. Believe it, online vip deposit casino along with other
    the games tend to be as easy or maybe as confusing- whether an online vip deposit casino or
    even an offline just one. They have provides that have to be attained prior to online vip deposit casino website is provided with it’s close up.

  8. Posted May 11, 2013 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    When someone writes an piece of writing he/she keeps the idea
    of a user in his/her brain that how a user can know it.
    Therefore that’s why this article is amazing. Thanks!

10 Trackbacks

  1. [...] 5, 2009 · No Comments This week’s Monday Note offers data and insight about the trajectory of Google AdSense and AdWords, explaining how Google [...]

  2. [...] Advertising: real change must happen [...]

  3. [...] reason to start searching. Here are a few leads. (This is the second of two parts, the first one is here) The AdTech conference took place last week, in Paris; the mood there wasn’t exactly a statement [...]

  4. [...] Frédéric Filloux, soulève le déséquilibre marqué des parts de bénéfices entre Google et ses partenaires (sites de contenus, médias). But this strong performance comes with declining prices and a growing imbalance in Google’s favor, at the expense of its partners (i.e. media sites)./…/ You get it: media are getting less and less advertising dollars and euros from Google. [...]

  5. [...] – Auf Mondaynote.com formuliert Frédéric Filloux ganz unverblümt: “Sorry to be blunt, but Internet advertising sucks.” Er fordert: Advertising – real Change must happen. [...]

  6. [...] Frédéric Filloux di Monday Note, la pubblicità on-line “fa schifo” e la maggior parte delle [...]

  7. [...] Frédéric Filloux di Monday Note, la pubblicità on-line “fa schifo” e la maggior parte delle [...]

  8. By Musiness model possibili per i giornali on May 19, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    [...] Fama via LSDI Secondo Frédéric Filloux di Monday Note, la pubblicità on-line “fa schifo” e la maggior parte delle campagne sono solo [...]

  9. [...] Advertising: real change must happen (mondaynote.com) [...]

  10. [...] en su también genial MondayNote (Leer por ej. The lethal self-complacency of advertising ; Advertising: real change must happen – Frédéric Filloux, paisano mió, es un consultor de medios de los más influyentes en Europa [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*