Comments on: Pixels: Size vs. Number http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/ Media, Tech & Business Models Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:09:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: poglaco72 http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-15699 poglaco72 Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:53:12 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-15699 Hey there, are you getting problems with your hosting? I essential had to refresh the page about four times to get the page to load. Just saying :) zvbrx <a href="http://www.spotarticle.com/businesses-individuals-both-participate-green-living.html" rel="nofollow">what is proactol</a> .^cUR Hey there, are you getting problems with your hosting? I essential had to refresh the page about four times to get the page to load. Just saying :) zvbrx what is proactol .^cUR

]]> By: bird houses for sale http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-15470 bird houses for sale Mon, 23 May 2011 22:43:10 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-15470 hey there, I would like ot thank you for posting such a useful outline hey there, I would like ot thank you for posting such a useful outline

]]> By: fajar http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-4927 fajar Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:44:15 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-4927 Thank you for the link... Thank you for the link…

]]> By: Johan http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-3937 Johan Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:14:18 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-3937 I googled up here, so I guess it's not too late for a quick fix: The size of a 1/1.7 inch sensor is actually as small as 43mm2 and a typical compact camera is even less, around 28mm2. There's a good reason the misleading cathode ray tube measuring is used to market them ;) Oh, and Foveon may be an acquired taste, but then you get addicted... I googled up here, so I guess it’s not too late for a quick fix: The size of a 1/1.7 inch sensor is actually as small as 43mm2 and a typical compact camera is even less, around 28mm2. There’s a good reason the misleading cathode ray tube measuring is used to market them ;)

Oh, and Foveon may be an acquired taste, but then you get addicted…

]]> By: The End of Megapixel Wars | Monday Note http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-1213 The End of Megapixel Wars | Monday Note Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:46:03 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-1213 [...] pictures in low light. (You might want to refer back to two Monday Notes on digital photography: Pixels Size vs. Number and More on Sensors Digital [...] [...] pictures in low light. (You might want to refer back to two Monday Notes on digital photography: Pixels Size vs. Number and More on Sensors Digital [...]

]]> By: More on sensors [digital photography] | Monday Note http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-619 More on sensors [digital photography] | Monday Note Sun, 03 May 2009 15:48:00 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-619 [...] Today, a similar debate goes on regarding the altogether simpler digital sensors. In the April 5th Monday Note #80, I took a first pass at the sensor size question, one that is, I believe, deliberately obscured by [...] [...] Today, a similar debate goes on regarding the altogether simpler digital sensors. In the April 5th Monday Note #80, I took a first pass at the sensor size question, one that is, I believe, deliberately obscured by [...]

]]> By: (virtual)void http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-560 (virtual)void Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:54:24 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-560 For a good comparison of the Foveon technology implementation vs comparable Bayer tech, please see: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp1/ For a good comparison of the Foveon technology implementation vs comparable Bayer tech, please see:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp1/

]]> By: Mike Cane http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/04/05/pixels-size-vs-number/#comment-559 Mike Cane Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:12:50 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=1637#comment-559 I didn't know you were a camera buff (or that posts were done here on Sunday!). Perhaps at some point you'll do an essay about current sensors in use versus the Foveon one that was never licensed by any major manufacturer for the mass market? http://www.foveon.com/ I didn’t know you were a camera buff (or that posts were done here on Sunday!).

Perhaps at some point you’ll do an essay about current sensors in use versus the Foveon one that was never licensed by any major manufacturer for the mass market?
http://www.foveon.com/

]]>