<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Processors: More, yes, but better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/09/27/processors-more-yes-but-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/09/27/processors-more-yes-but-better/</link>
	<description>Media, Tech &#38; Business Models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/09/27/processors-more-yes-but-better/#comment-5352</link>
		<dc:creator>roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2107#comment-5352</guid>
		<description>my processor is from AMD. very nice.... phenom II black edition..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my processor is from AMD. very nice&#8230;. phenom II black edition..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fajar</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/09/27/processors-more-yes-but-better/#comment-4881</link>
		<dc:creator>fajar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2107#comment-4881</guid>
		<description>mantapsss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mantapsss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/09/27/processors-more-yes-but-better/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2107#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Your Athlon 64 Processor...&lt;/strong&gt;

Processor
The Athlon 64 processors have been around for a while now and they have proven themselves the market leaders in processing power.  As we know AMD processor run at a lot slower speeds than Intel processors making them cooler to run.
With the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Your Athlon 64 Processor&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Processor<br />
The Athlon 64 processors have been around for a while now and they have proven themselves the market leaders in processing power.  As we know AMD processor run at a lot slower speeds than Intel processors making them cooler to run.<br />
With the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Processors: More, yes, but better?</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/09/27/processors-more-yes-but-better/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Processors: More, yes, but better?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2107#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>[...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptLast week’s Intel Developers’ Forum brought the expected crop of new CPU chips . The simplest way to summarize what’s taking place is this: We’re stuck at 3GHz, so we add more processors on the CPU chip. Intel continues to lead with small “geometries”, 32 nanometers today, 22 nm tomorrow. The company pitches its x-86 processors for mobile devices. More processors : Once upon a time, each year brought a significant increase in processor speed. Not to be too wistful about the ear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptLast week’s Intel Developers’ Forum brought the expected crop of new CPU chips . The simplest way to summarize what’s taking place is this: We’re stuck at 3GHz, so we add more processors on the CPU chip. Intel continues to lead with small “geometries”, 32 nanometers today, 22 nm tomorrow. The company pitches its x-86 processors for mobile devices. More processors : Once upon a time, each year brought a significant increase in processor speed. Not to be too wistful about the ear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
