Comments on: The 2010 Tech Watch List http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/01/03/the-2010-tech-watch-list/ Media, Tech & Business Models Tue, 21 May 2013 03:49:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: fajar http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/01/03/the-2010-tech-watch-list/#comment-4850 fajar Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:08:47 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2343#comment-4850 mantapsss mantapsss

]]> By: Charles Jolley http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/01/03/the-2010-tech-watch-list/#comment-1884 Charles Jolley Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:40:59 +0000 http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2343#comment-1884 I don't think the shift publishers have to make is "web-centric" in any way we are thinking of it today. This is something different. Content-generating companies like Time are valuable because they are good at creating curated content. But, web-browser content is low-fi which makes it hard to create curated content people will pay for. Think of how ugly your typical online magazine website looks vis-a-vis the print edition. A tablet running software like the Bonnier demo will make content publishers' core competency relevant again. This is why I think it has a chance for success where past attempts have failed. I don’t think the shift publishers have to make is “web-centric” in any way we are thinking of it today. This is something different.

Content-generating companies like Time are valuable because they are good at creating curated content. But, web-browser content is low-fi which makes it hard to create curated content people will pay for. Think of how ugly your typical online magazine website looks vis-a-vis the print edition.

A tablet running software like the Bonnier demo will make content publishers’ core competency relevant again. This is why I think it has a chance for success where past attempts have failed.

]]>