<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crowdsourcing Propaganda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/</link>
	<description>Media, Tech &#38; Business Models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:33:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oakley Outlet</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/#comment-29547</link>
		<dc:creator>Oakley Outlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 02:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2471#comment-29547</guid>
		<description>The good quality Oakley Sunglasses can be gotten from our Oakley Outlet no matter how much the Oakley Radar Sunglasses are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good quality Oakley Sunglasses can be gotten from our Oakley Outlet no matter how much the Oakley Radar Sunglasses are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fajar</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/#comment-4836</link>
		<dc:creator>fajar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2471#comment-4836</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian fidler</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>brian fidler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2471#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>Too much attention is given to Flash. As a Flash designer/developer I find I am developing less and less in Flash and much more in Javascript. The success of Flash was largely based on the poor user experience that we were forced to endure with early browsers. 

Flash driven websites provided a palette of endless variety to designers that allowed us to play, outside of the browsers restrictions. The flip side to this however is we didn&#039;t leverage, or maybe forgot to leverage, those things that browsers did well and often disrupted the user experience by plastering it with attempts to replicate the browsers&#039; built in functionality (witness non-function Flash based scrollbars). 

Now browsers coupled with javascript allow designers to do 95% of what might have required Flash only 2 or 3 years ago. Flash itself has been transformed into primarily a delivery mechanism for video and very out-of-the-box sites, however as our browsing technologies evolve, Flash may be remembered as a bridge that helped direct us but ultimately couldn&#039;t deliver us to our destination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much attention is given to Flash. As a Flash designer/developer I find I am developing less and less in Flash and much more in Javascript. The success of Flash was largely based on the poor user experience that we were forced to endure with early browsers. </p>
<p>Flash driven websites provided a palette of endless variety to designers that allowed us to play, outside of the browsers restrictions. The flip side to this however is we didn&#8217;t leverage, or maybe forgot to leverage, those things that browsers did well and often disrupted the user experience by plastering it with attempts to replicate the browsers&#8217; built in functionality (witness non-function Flash based scrollbars). </p>
<p>Now browsers coupled with javascript allow designers to do 95% of what might have required Flash only 2 or 3 years ago. Flash itself has been transformed into primarily a delivery mechanism for video and very out-of-the-box sites, however as our browsing technologies evolve, Flash may be remembered as a bridge that helped direct us but ultimately couldn&#8217;t deliver us to our destination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Youssef Rahoui</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>Youssef Rahoui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2471#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>Very clear, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very clear, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jahangir Naina</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jahangir Naina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2471#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>The iPad is simply the next iteration of the PC, where it transforms from a tool for the PC literate, to the tool for the masses. It becomes more of an appliance for the everyman (along the lines of where Jef Raskin envisioned the Mac to be), with another layer of abstraction applied to mask the inner workings (so no filesystem exposed, a more minimalistic UX, direct &quot;digital&quot; (as in finger based) object manipulation,etc). 

The iPad is Steve&#039;s way of sneaking in the heir apparent and the future replacement  to the Mac, disguised as an eBook and a media consumption device. Don&#039;t be fooled by this. Apple is actually doing a product category reboot for the Mac line. It is a trojan horse approach to ensure that the ankle-biters of the world (think Dvorak and their ilk) don&#039;t go ape-shit and tank the stock. Steve is determined to ensure that the transition from the Mac to the iPad will far more smoother than the transition from the Apple II line to the Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPad is simply the next iteration of the PC, where it transforms from a tool for the PC literate, to the tool for the masses. It becomes more of an appliance for the everyman (along the lines of where Jef Raskin envisioned the Mac to be), with another layer of abstraction applied to mask the inner workings (so no filesystem exposed, a more minimalistic UX, direct &#8220;digital&#8221; (as in finger based) object manipulation,etc). </p>
<p>The iPad is Steve&#8217;s way of sneaking in the heir apparent and the future replacement  to the Mac, disguised as an eBook and a media consumption device. Don&#8217;t be fooled by this. Apple is actually doing a product category reboot for the Mac line. It is a trojan horse approach to ensure that the ankle-biters of the world (think Dvorak and their ilk) don&#8217;t go ape-shit and tank the stock. Steve is determined to ensure that the transition from the Mac to the iPad will far more smoother than the transition from the Apple II line to the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom b</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/02/14/crowdsourcing-propaganda/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>tom b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=2471#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen people get excited about a slow, black-and-white Kindle. When they see the iPad in FULL COLOR, with far more capabilities than reading books, they will be sold instantly.

When Net book buyers see that the iPad is fast, rugged, and competitively priced, many of them will be won over, as well.

I am surprised the reception for the device has not been stronger, but there are MANY, MANY investors who would like to see someone other than Apple coming out with a new &quot;growth engine&quot;-- people who bet prematurely on Android, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen people get excited about a slow, black-and-white Kindle. When they see the iPad in FULL COLOR, with far more capabilities than reading books, they will be sold instantly.</p>
<p>When Net book buyers see that the iPad is fast, rugged, and competitively priced, many of them will be won over, as well.</p>
<p>I am surprised the reception for the device has not been stronger, but there are MANY, MANY investors who would like to see someone other than Apple coming out with a new &#8220;growth engine&#8221;&#8211; people who bet prematurely on Android, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
