I have two cameras in front of me: My smartphone and a Canon’s S90. And I wonder: Why isn’t there an app store for this neat compact camera?
I can download any number of third-party, post-processing photo applications to my smartphone. I can crop, filter, stitch, frame… And there will be more applications tomorrow. With my “real” camera, I’m stuck with yesterday’s features.
As the saying goes, the better camera is the one you always carry. (By the way, “Better Camera” is the name of a smartphone application…) In that sense, smartphone cameras have a major advantage, they’re always at the ready.
But…smartphones cameras have tiny sensors, tiny lenses, tiny flashes. While the technology improves with each new generation, smartphone cameras will always lag behind the resolution, speed, and depth of single-purpose compact cameras, with their better lenses and bigger sensors. And, yes, compared to even “realer” cameras such as DSLRs, the compact cousin has much to learn, but try stuffing the callipygian Nikon D3s in your pocket.
Wouldn’t it be neat to have the superior picture taking capabilities of the Canon S90 (or other competitors such as the upcoming Panasonic LX-5) and the benefits of downloadable third-party applications to perform more in-camera processing and editing, to say nothing of smartphone-like communication capabilities?
Technically, such a hybrid is easier said than done. Add the circuitry (processor, memory, communications) of a smartphone to an existing compact camera and, done poorly, you’d get a “feature-rich” monstrous contraption that does more than either donor product, but that does none of them as well. Cost would also be a challenge.
But the idea is in the air.
Years ago, enterprising geeks found a way to break into and modify Canon’s DIGIC, the camera’s on-board image processor. This has become a worldwide hacking community project called CHDK, the Canon Hack Development Kit. It covers dozens of Canon cameras and its forum discussions are available in thirteen languages, including Farsi and Finnish. Imagine what hackers would do if a good compact camera had the processing power, the UI, the development tools, and the app store of a smartphone.
The Android world might be give us hope. In China, where so many smartphones and compact cameras are made, there’s a parallel version of Android called OPhone. A product of Google’s Apache licensing model, OPhone can use Android source code and modify it at will–as long as it doesn’t call itself Android. (I’ve simplified the licensing arcana a bit but without distorting the main point of the story.)
An enterprising Chinese ODM, one the many companies that manufacture products for big brand names, could take the matter into its own hands and create a smartcamera hybrid.
This, in turn, might cause the visionary sheep at one of the better known camera makers to embrace the idea.
Would it be profitable? For a sense of proportion, digital camera sales reached about 110 million units in 2009, a 12% decrease from 2008. 2010 numbers are expected to go back to 2008 levels. These are respectable volumes. They’re less than cell phones but more than netbooks (79 million in 2009).
The idea of an app store has gained acceptance. We’ve already seen Google TV, which is pushing on beyond cable. What other consumer products could be enhanced by a lively market of downloadable apps?
- App Cameras TweetIn an August, 2010 Monday Note titled Smartcameras In Our Future?, I wished for smartphone-like apps running on a nice compact camera such as Canon’s S90 (now replaced by the S100). At the time, in-camera photo processing was limited and wireless connectivity required accessories like Eye-Fi, a clever but not so easy-to-use SD card with [...]...
- The End of Megapixel Wars TweetFinally, reason is about to prevail over marketing machismo. Specifically, Canon and Sony are coming up with more advanced cameras featuring less pixels. Why? In these new cameras, less pixels translates into better pictures in low light. (You might want to refer back to two Monday Notes on digital photography: Pixels Size vs. Number and More [...]...
- The End Of Megapixel Wars – Part II – The Canon S90 TweetLast August, I wrote about picture quality finally winning against macho marketing. In other words, it seemed Canon, Nikon and Sony were giving up the simplistic escalation: my camera has more pixels than yours, therefore it is better. In the P&S (Point & Shoot) category especially, the facts were that more pixels ended up producing [...]...
- What future for the Macintosh? TweetWith Apple’s smartphones and tablets making so much money and taking up so much media bandwidth, one has to wonder: Is there a future for the Macintosh? We’ll first take a look at broad trend numbers and try not to molest them too much. As we saw last week, they’ll confess to anything when under [...]...
- RIM’s Future: Dead, Alive, Reborn? TweetMuch has been written about RIM’s gloomy quarterly numbers, most of it sensible (with one brain flatulence exception). The attention is a testament—an apt word—to the place RIM once occupied. From its humble pager origins, the BlackBerry, rightly nicknamed CrackBerry, became the de rigueur device of enterprise users. Like most former BlackBerry fans, I have [...]...