Let’s come back to the ebook with more questions. There is no doubt: the digital book will find its place under the sun; its prospects look much better than those of the online press. In the first place, there isn’t an ingrained, now decade-old, habit of reading news for free on the internet. Second, the book (in its physical form) is the centuries-old incarnation of the “cognitive container”, with its unparalleled convenience and with a value attached to it. And third, it can’t be unbundled.
For the online press, on the contrary, more than 90% of online newspapers are available for free. The “cognitive container” is totally non-practical in terms of size, readability; the interface sucks: most broadsheets’ stories run on two pages but many readers don’t go beyond the jump. Lastly, the daily news is begging for unbundling (look at the Sunday edition of your favorite newspaper, with its ten plus sections).
What does the book gain by switching to the electronic format?
Three things:
- new formats with rich media appealing to reluctant books readers (the current Generations X and Y, mainly)
- enhanced capabilities such as search, ability to create a personal table of contents, or to extract and index snippets
- a complete overhaul in the production system, which will breed new market opportunities as editorial works, once finished, will enjoy instant worldwide availability.
Of course, obstacles remain. A recent survey conducted by Bain and Co listed eight obstacles in the way of widespread ebook adoption (PDF here).
Interestingly enough, said its authors Patrick Behar and Laurent Colombani, the nostalgia of the “paper experience” is disconnected from the generation factor: all age groups continue to enjoy the book as a physical object. This guarantees some level of coexistence between the two medias. But the authors also admit the two next barriers – the price of the device and reading comfort – will fade quickly as Moore’s Law still rules, both for mass produced devices and for screen quality (see for instance Qualcomm’s Mirasol display combining the advantages of electronic ink and the color depth of LCD screen — see also this story in The New York Times). On the devices’ price, Bain & Co sees the following evolution and point to the thresholds required to convert purchase intents:
Using this backdrop, let’s now try to see how the different participants might fare. (For a close-ip on the digital rights issue, see last week’s Monday Note)
Manufacturers: uncertain. Users expect around a hundred dollars or euros for an e-reader and will soon expect three times this amount for a full color, full-feature tablet. To put things in perspective, a teardown analysis made by iSuppli shows the cost of components for an Amazon Kindle is $176 as the iPad reaches $264 and $214 for the Samsung Galaxy Tab. This gives an idea how thin margins are likely to be in the future. In other words, manufacturers who won’t be able to sell the blades (i.e. contents) along with the razor will have a hard time making any money.
Because of its use of high cost components and profits before units volume culture, Apple won’t be keen to smash prices, especially if it is able to maintain its technological edge. This seems already the case with the Galaxy Tab: see a lukewarm review by Walt Mossberg, and a trashing by Gizmodo who call it A Pocketable Train Wreck. (For having played with the Tab, I won’t be so hard: the device carries way more features than the iPad, while being less fluid and stylish, for sure).
Publishers: warning. Let’s put it this way: I wouldn’t bet the farm on book publishing houses at this moment. For the vast majority of them, they don’t seem to grasp the full potential of the ebook. Some are stuck in their defense of the paper-based book by preventing Google Books from scanning their inventory – of which 80% is not available to the public for a variety of practical reasons, mostly the fixed cost of a print run compared to the low sales of specialized or out-of-fashion titles. In the meantime, many publishers say — publicly — their digital future lies essentially in the enriched book loaded with multimedia features and contents. Except for one thing: in private, they invest very little in such features. In addition, the notion of R&D seems completely alien to their culture.
Authors: invent & enjoy. By authors, I’m encompassing the typical writer who sweats in front of his/her computer, but also yet-to-emerge new breeds of ebook designers, producers, editors and marketers. The ability to tell an original story, to edit a journalistic investigation will remain essential. But the notion of producing a complete package will become acquire a new importance as users will care for more multimedia features. At the same time, marketing will require new skills such as organizing an efficient presence on social medias.
New entrants: a boulevard ahead Except if publishers are able to set up agile digital teams within their ranks, these new talents and crafts will blossom outside the framework of traditional publishing houses. These incumbents are likely to suffer from the syndrome that still plagues the newspaper industry: no appetite for technology, no belief that mastering cutting edge technologies are key success factors, therefore no propensity to invest in engineering. This will leave wide boulevards completely open for new competitors eager to combine the professionalism associated with traditional publishing with the most advanced technology. Get ready for the Huffington Post of book publishing (hopefully less disingenuous).
Telcos: joining the fray
Telecommunications companies, especially cellular carriers, are likely to play a key role in the development of the ebook. First of all, they will subsidize tablets and readers; in some instances, they will offer free downloads for books or multimedia contents as part of deals with retailers. In some countries they will aggregate contents on their own portals and manage the distribution process. In Japan, carriers do exactly that for a rather inexpensive 9% of the retail price.
Bookstores: a small number of survivors
The city of New York had 330 bookstores in the Thirties, recalls the publisher Andre Schiffrin in its just released Words & Money; now, the number is down to 30. In France, Germany and Spain, laws preventing excessive discounts by big retailers saved bookstores. In the long run though, they will have to adapt fast. This might be easier than originally thought: apparently, Google will built its Google Editions around bookstores by allowing them to open e-stores through its program. In doing so, bookstores – well, some of them – could offer books-on-demand printing services, eliminating costly physical inventories. This could result in millions of out-of-print books made available on paper again. New specialized printers such as the Expresso Book Machine are now able to spit a paperback in 4 minutes and for about $8 (video here). Soon, the best managed bookstores, even modest ones, will be able to rent such machine for the price of a large photocopier.
Of course, we should expect some level of Darwinian elimination along with spontaneous creations. Within a short period of time, all tools needed to transform the industry will become available and affordable. Books and long form reading shouldn’t be counted out, only some of today’s participants will be.
—frederic.filloux@mondaynote.com
Related columns:
- ebooks: trading digital rights, not files TweetThere are many reasons to be bullish for ebooks. On the device side, the iPad set the standard (rather high) and triggered an intense competition among manufacturers and operating systems providers. On the people side, just take New York’s subway, or a high-speed train in Europe. And we’ve seen nothing yet: tablets prices will go [...]...
- Ebooks and Apps, same challenges Tweet(Second of a series) Last week, we looked at the ebook’s Giant Disruption. A new ecosystem in which Amazon eats publishers’ and agents’ lunch by luring authors into self-publishing. Today, we examine the new regime’s impact on book-making and distribution processes. The outcome will surprise few readers: Over time, the new book publishing business will [...]...
- eBooks and Smartphones TweetUpdate: see a presentation of the Kindle2 here. Another look at an old, but not aging, topic: eBooks. There is visible agitation ahead of Amazon’s expected announcement, probably as you read this note Monday February 9th. Jeff Bezos is set to announce a new version of the Kindle eBook reader, let’s call it Kindle 2.0. [...]...
- Ebooks: Defending the Agency Model Tweet(Last of a series — for a while.) Launching an antitrust probe against books publishers, as the US Department of Justice might do, can’t come at a weirdest time. In the two previous Monday Notes, we explained how Amazon is maneuvering itself into a position to dominate the entire book industry. The Seattle giant keeps [...]...
- Ebooks: The Giant Disruption Tweet(Part of a series) In the last twelve months, I’ve never bought fewer printed books — and I’ve never read so many books. I have switched to ebooks. My personal library is with me at all times, in my iPad and my iPhone (and in the cloud), allowing me to switch reading devices as conditions [...]...







9 Comments
I’m borderline between Gen-X and Gen-Y, but actually quite enjoy reading physical books (apart from 1,000+-pages tomes, whether textbooks or epic novels, where weight starts becoming an issue).
For me the appeal of ebooks (especially with a hardware reader) is in weight-saving. I guess my concern is rather atypical for my generation, and more similar to older eBook fans such as The Atlantic’s James Fallows, but as someone who built up a physical library of books early on, and has relocated to several countries, nowadays you have to make a *really* serious case for me to consider buying a physical book. I’m giving my old ones away!
Wow, what an insightful post, I love it and see so many business opportunities here!
This support my thoughts in my blog post about “Media industry disruption creates possibilities”: http://alfabravo.com/2010/11/02/media-disruption-possibilities/
So I completely agree with: “This will leave wide boulevards completely open for new competitors eager to combine the professionalism associated with traditional publishing with the most advanced technology.”
The key here I think is to find (the few, unusual), experienced media industry people that are open to innovation and new business models, and combine them with talented business developers, programmers and marketing people that are not from the media sector. The result can be innovative media formats that will succeed!
The major problem with ebooks are the book publishers.
EBook purchases are often impulse shopping. But the price point that publishers insist on stop that.
Let me give an example. I went to the Monterey Aquarium a few weeks ago. There are signs, banners, and quotations EVERYWHERE about Steinbeck’s Cannery Row. I had not read the book for decades. I had my Droid on me with both the Nook and the Kindle reading software. I figured — hey, let’s get the book.
But Penguin insists that B&N and Amazon charge almost $10 for the ebook — higher than their price for a new paperback. Even though, after decades of being required reading in English classes, used copies of the paperback are available for a dollar or two in any used bookstore or online. If Penguin had been willing to sell the ebook for less than $5, I would have bought it as an impulse. But not at $9 when I knew I could get it used for so much less.
Stupid.
Fritz- spot on. The publishers need to get on board and realize the price it too high for the average reader. The main reason I have not bought a kindle/nook is for this reason. You cut out the material cost, printing, and marketing and the price should go WAY down.
Does anyone know the publisher’s reasoning for this?
Net Impact Peter wrote a book in the paper less I think I good to the world. Reduce not cut down trees
Why do not we sell the same ebook to me that the future may be like that. Because it can be used to ipad & ipod and other.
The publishers see what happened to the music industry once music went digital. A&R execs got shown the door by the boat load, before iTunes even opened it’s iStore.
To some extent piracy in movies and DVD markets too.
Probably will take the wide availability of pirate content of a large part of the recent release market before they get on board, or until they start getting their lunches cut by new encoded HTML5/eBook entrants to the market.
Very interesting article especially for me about the “print on demand machine” which I had been dreaming about and which should provide the evolutionary step to an ubiquitous ebook. I just spent 160 EUR for getting 6 paperback copies of an autobiography from a copyshop; I am pleased to see that the cost should come much down and probably the quality up.
I think it is a very good tool. For research. For marketing.
7 Trackbacks
[...] in tutte le analisi di mercato che si rispettino è doveroso verificare quali siano le barriere all’adozione degli [...]
[...] was forwarded “Monday Note #157,” which includes an interesting writeup on eBook winners and losers. I was drawn to the graph on [...]
[...] o utente o, più semplicemente, il lettore (cosa che invece prende in considerazione un altro articolo, molto [...]
[...] Ebooks Winners & Losers Frédéric Filloux, Monday Note Authors: invent & enjoy. By authors, I’m encompassing the typical writer who sweats in front of his/her computer, but also yet-to-emerge new breeds of ebook designers, producers, editors and marketers. The ability to tell an original story, to edit a journalistic investigation will remain essential. But the notion of producing a complete package will become acquire a new importance as users will care for more multimedia features. At the same time, marketing will require new skills such as organizing an efficient presence on social medias. [...]
[...] Filloux / Monday Note:Ebooks Winners & Losers — Lеt’s come back tο tһе ebook wіtһ more [...]
[...] whole new experience for the user–which I think is key to boosting ebook sales. According to this post 41% of survey respondents (the modal respondant) were unwilling to adopt ebooks because they are [...]
[...] (source) [...]