Navigation’s Destination

by Jean-Louis Gassée

The frustrations began with the (many) limitations of the Pioneer after-market navigation system in the Toyota I use while in France. I can deal with the inscrutable UI and the belligerent touch screen—“resistive technology”, indeed–but I need up-to-date maps (which are clearly antiquated on this device) and a precise reading of my speed. European roads combine baffling speed limit changes and an aggressive deployment of automated radar cameras. You don’t want to rely on your car’s imprecise speedometer if you want to drive just at—or maybe just over—the speed limit.

I need a second opinion.

A quick walk to the Louvre Apple Store and I have my prize, the TomTom GPS adapter for my iPhone, 99€. I download maps of Western Europe—including speed limits—from the App Store for $74.99 and, while I’m at it, I spend another $5.99 for one month of real-time, over-the-air traffic updates. The download is horribly slow and fails at first, even with a reliable WiFi connection, but I finally get it running. Onto the windshield. The suction cup performs its appointed function; the tilt and swivel is commendably ergonomic; there’s even a Bluetooth pairing feature for handsfree calls, indispensible in France where the gendarmes are touchy about touching a cell phone while driving. Sound quality is below par, but it’ll do. I’m in business.

(As an aside, I would have liked to have used Google’s free turn-by-turn app on my Droid X, but the Verizon network is incompatible with the European “GSM” standard.)

We head to the Basque country. The TomTom displays clean speed readings and warns me about impending speed traps. Yes, it occasionally gets confused and suggests a slower pace even as the road signs disagree, but…close enough. The Pioneer…forget it.

Things take a turn for the worse when we drive from France into Spain towards Bilbao—we want to take a look at the Guggenheim museum.

(Photo courtesy of Gaspar Serrano;

It’s a 100 km (60 mi.) drive from the no-stopping border (a pleasant affect of the EU) on the smooth E70. But just past San Sebastiàn both GPS units go crazy. They don’t know this freeway. I expect as much from the aging Pioneer unit, but what about the TomTom map I just downloaded? Not knowing about some rarely used back-country lane is one thing, getting lost around a major new European freeway? It’s not as if this is a state secret.

Approaching Bilbao, I try to get detailed directions to the Guggenheim. The TomTom app’s POIs (Points of Interest) finds it immediately. The Pioneer unit has never heard of the museum. Maybe it’s too new: After all, it did just open…13 years ago.

So the standalone TomTom wins? Unfortunately, there are problems.

On our way back to Paris, the iPhone GPS adapter starts acting up. It won’t charge the phone and the “This accessory is not made to work with iPhone” message blinks on and off at random times. I re-mate the Bluetooth and it disappears for an hour or so, but then it comes back on for good. I apply the official suggestions, no joy. It’s not the iPhone—I have a spare car charger lying around and verify that the iPhone isn’t on the fritz.

I call the TomTom Support number. They’re closed from Christmas until the New Year. “Try us again later.”

Still, it was a good trip, the Basque know how to live, the roads were clear, and I didn’t get flashed. But…

This got me thinking about the state and future of Navigation. Integrated navigation systems amount to a nice racket, an expensive option on most cars. We don’t have to have one, but we willingly pay $1,000 or more for the integration— no dangling wires, no unseemly windshield or dashboard protuberances to sully our pristine conveyances—and that’s probably enough to push a car sale into the black all by itself. A year or so later, we get a letter in the mail offering software/map updates ranging from $185 (Japanese) to $295 (Wehrmacht staff cars). They must have been watching Microsoft peddling Office updates.

During the Basque trip, I compared the TomTom (and, with flagging enthusiasm, the Pioneer), to Google Maps on my iPhone. You can guess what I saw: The E70 extension that mystified TomTom and Pioneer wasn’t a problem for Google. If you want turn-by-turn navigation with up-to-date maps—and you don’t want to get fleeced—get an Android phone with Google’s application.

Maintaining maps is a Sisyphean task. You need a lot of money, a lot of data, and a lot of people. How many companies can compete with Google on these three fronts?

Once upon a time, Nokia bought a mapping company called Navteq and TomTom bought TeleAtlas. Neither company has Google’s money or data or culture, and, above all, its goals. Google hires a battalion of contractors to minutely edit map legends and their translations. We’ve seen their odd-looking mapping vehicles that carry high-precision cameras, GPS, and the controversial but ultimately helpful WiFi SSID mapping units. (WiFi triangulation helps when a GPS signal isn’t available.)

We know Google’s strategy: They want to be everything to everyone, everywhere, all the time. This is the means to their advertising money pump (a.k.a. their business model). Google’s definition of “openness” is they want us to be always open to their stream of ads. Google Maps, a splendid product, full of clever nuances and constantly improved, is a strong component of that overall strategy.

What does this mean for the future of navigation devices?

Carmakers will continue to get an integration premium. Some, like BMW, already “sell” Google Maps. If you’re connected to the Google Cloud, the update problem disappears…the only button you have to press is “Refresh”. It’ll be interesting to see what Apple, Nokia, RIM, and Microsoft will do to up this ante.

One last anecdote.

On the way back to the airport, we’re in luck. We’re in the audience of a geeky cab driver. In addition to the cab company terminal, he has an iPhone, a TomTom, and a Coyote device. We exchange stories. He complains about the TomTom update process. Once a month, he has to connect it to his computer, a chancy, clunky experience. The Coyote unit is more sophisticated, it combines a GPS locator and a 3G link to the Cloud. (Apparently, there is some new combination between TomTom and Coyote. And I realize, too late, there is a Coyote iPhone app…) Pay a monthly fee and you get speed trap updates in real time. But the kicker is this: These updates are crowdsourced. Drivers notify the Coyote Systems of new traps and the updates spread instantly.

Cloud + Crowd = might.

We happen upon an accident. The driver punches a button on his cab’s terminal, sending time and location to the company’s servers and, as a side-effect, to other drivers.

Soon to be a Google Maps service?

JLG@mondaynote.com

Be Sociable, Share!

Related columns:

  1. The future of content navigation TweetLet’s forget business models and monetization — just for a brief moment. Instead, we’ll focus on one key issue: the interface, the way you access, browse, spot, save relevant information. The interface is pivotal. A good one will allow you to rope in your readers / viewers, and make them loyal to your brand, your [...]...

19 Comments

  1. Posted January 9, 2011 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    In France, Google Maps uses TeleAtlas data (“données cartographiques © TeleAtlas” is displayed at the bottom of the map when the map includes only French territory).

  2. Posted January 10, 2011 at 4:05 am | Permalink

    Your note reminded me to writeup my recent GPS induced comedy moment in Florence:

    http://www.zmetro.com/archives/019392.php

    On balance, GPS is a huge blessing, but it, like any technology has its challenges. I used my iPhone’s map app a number of times, but it, too had a few challenges.

  3. Posted January 10, 2011 at 4:52 am | Permalink

    When I bought my last vehicle (2008) it had built in nav ($2,500 system) – I wanted everything but and the dealer was nice enough to ripped it out and sold me the Jeep without.
    Tech and display tech changes at a much more rapid pace than vehicles. Everything on a car is old by the time it’s sold. I’ll never buy built-in, only add ons or handhelds.

  4. Les posen
    Posted January 10, 2011 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    For uptodate crowd sourcing for iPhone and iPad look at the Trapster app and community.

  5. Jay
    Posted January 10, 2011 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    UREKA! For awhile now I’ve been wondering why Google is working on a self-driving car, and for some reason the light bulb just went off. They want to reduce the cost of those “odd-looking mapping vehicles” that sweep the globe, wherein the expense of the human driver must even exceed the fuel and hardware expense. Thanks for another informative post.

  6. Leo
    Posted January 10, 2011 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    Tom Tom also has crowd sourcing on its home brewed devices. Touch the screen and all other happy Tom Tom campers know there is a malevolent gendarme with a laser speed gun round the bend. It works through a gsm connexion. It’s the Coyote deal. But the icing on the cake is that the same service buys you instant traffic monitoring and re-routing. Traffic is monitored real time buy analyzing the gsm signals from Vodafone (and SFR in France) subscribers driving on the roads. Must be a nice piece of software. That is really worth the 70€ yearly subscription…. and Tome Tom will not survive if they don’t build a healthy service revenue stream. Sounds very familiar for all IT industry veterans.

  7. Leo
    Posted January 10, 2011 at 8:01 pm | Permalink

    On another point, it’s strange your Tom Tom App didn’t know E70 between San Sebastian and Bilbao. The map on their website does. Must be have been a serious update problem when they created the app.
    As for the superiority of a permanently updated (?) Google map on Android phones, my experience is when you leave the major thoroughfares you are left to dry in the Sun (weather permitting) for lack of a 3G signal. Nice as the landscape may be, you are safer driving in the Cevennes of Alentejo with a standalone Tom Tom than with a Samsung Galaxy S.
    Achilles heel of mobile tech: the laws of physics. At the frequencies used, you need a close transmitter tower.

  8. Henry Sinn
    Posted January 11, 2011 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    Hmm..
    In my opinion Nokia wins. No contest.
    Why? Because the only time we really want navigation services is when we are away from home.
    When we are away from home [travelling] we find ourselves roaming [data networks]… EXPENSIVE! .
    The Navteq maps on the Nokia devices are comprehensive and up to date [if you ever plug your phone into your computer and / or do updates] and are stored locally therefore NOT requiring an active data connection.
    AND
    They are free with the phone [put your $99 --> many hundreds of dollars to better use]
    AND
    You can sort out all your travel plans and destination in the comfort of a chair and a PC [maps.ovi.com] before you travel [then a quick sync with phone and your off]

    PS. I don’t work for Nokia.

  9. Henry Sinn
    Posted January 11, 2011 at 8:29 am | Permalink

    Forgot:
    AND
    They now own Trapster

  10. DD
    Posted January 11, 2011 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    Why TomTom and not Navigon? I use Navigon (here in N. America) and it works great. No data connection required, has turn-by-turn navigation and lots of Points of Interest. Doesn’t require any additional hardware. Well worth the money…

    DD

  11. Murando
    Posted January 13, 2011 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    You forgot one major problem of the cloud in Europe: Roaming costs. Traveling 20 km south of my home I am in another country: “no-stopping border” for human beings but for bits and bytes a really expensive one. 50 KB (!) are US$ 0,22

  12. imagine
    Posted January 13, 2011 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    i think my next phone is going to be an android. as much as i love the sexiness of iphone, i can live without apple. google i cannot. from gmail to maps to search, everything is baked into the os and superior to the experience on iphone.

  13. Posted January 14, 2011 at 2:11 am | Permalink

    @imagine – I’m the exact opposite, I can live without Google (except for maps – maybe). The coverage in areas I travel are bad so the cloud isn’t an option I can rely on. And to be honest, google cloud apps pale in comparison to my app versions so not sure I’d use even if I had ubiquitous broadband.

  14. Offline
    Posted January 16, 2011 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    You kids realize that with the latest Google Maps on Android, it works offline too? Cuts down drastically on roaming charges. You load your route while you have WiFi and then hit the road. You can also download the map for the area you are going the same way.

    http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/next-generation-of-mobile-maps.html

    And yes, still free. No monthly or yearly charges.

  15. Posted January 17, 2011 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Have you heard of Waze (http://world.waze.com/) for crowdsourced mapping and traffic alerts ?

  16. Robert
    Posted January 30, 2011 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    “Wehrmacht staff cars” – seriously?

  17. Posted May 13, 2011 at 2:30 am | Permalink

    It’s very good.

  18. Posted June 21, 2011 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    We have a speed limit overlay that is partially crowdsourced. Avail for html5, android, whatever.

    27 million signs worldwide. “.org” so you know its not full of ads.

    WikiSPEEDia.org

  19. Posted July 14, 2011 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    thanks for sharing.I enjoy it.

One Trackback

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by infokubo, jose moreno. jose moreno said: [RSSmedia] Navigation’s Destination: by Jean-Louis Gassée The frustrations began with the (many) limitations of … http://bit.ly/g2awuj [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*