Let me jump to the conclusion: This is an extraordinary book on many levels: informative, entertaining often, insightful, sympathetic but not indulgent; it rises to its unusual subject and manages to render its complexity in a straightforward manner that attests to the biographer’s talent.
Get thee to a physical bookstore, if you can find one, or to Amazon’s or Apple’s online dispensers, you won’t regret it. And if you don’t have the time or patience, start with Chapter Thirty-Six: The iPhone, Revolutionary Products in One (page 465 on paper, easily searched on electrons).
Last year, Walt Isaacson called to talk about the bio Steve had asked him to write. No surprise there, Dear Leader always wanted the best, and Isaacson had written world-class biographies of Ben Franklin, Einstein, and Henry Kissinger.
I told Isaacson how sad this felt, how I perceived Steve’s decision as ‘‘putting his affairs in order’’ before leaving this Earth. Walt didn’t answer directly, but he did say something shocking: Steve had relinquished all control over the book, all decisions were Walt’s. I didn’t believe it. I couldn’t see Steve giving up control on anything. His fanatical attention to detail is, sorry, was a key ingredient of his success. But Steve’s editorial grip on the book went no further than his picture on the cover. In Isaacson’s words:
“He had never, in two years, asked anything about what I was putting in the book or what conclusions I had drawn. But now he looked at me and said, “I know there will be a lot in your book I won’t like.” It was more a question than a statement, and when he stared at me for a response, I nodded, smiled, and said I was sure that would be true. “That’s good,” he said. “Then it won’t seem like an in-house book. I won’t read it for a while, because I don’t want to get mad. Maybe I will read it in a year—if I’m still around.” By then, his eyes were closed and his energy gone, so I quietly took my leave.”
To be sure, this isn’t your typical CEO encomium where the slightest achievements are remembered as world-changing deeds, and unseemly details are airbrushed into endearing idiosyncrasies.
The arc of Steve’s life is the stuff of legends: Abandoned at birth; raised in Silicon Valley; an acid-dropping, ashram-dwelling college drop-out, hacker, and co-founder of the most iconic of personal computer companies; fired at age thirty; re-inventor of animated movies at Pixar; the struggle to create the NeXT big thing; the return to Apple in the most stunning turnaround the industry had ever seen; reshaping the music industry; building a world-class retail network in his own image; re-inventing the smartphone industry and grabbing half of its profits; and, finally, after thirty years of false starts, making tablets a reality and grabbing iPod-like market and profit share as a result. An arc that saw the unmanageable hippie become the head of one of the world’s best-managed companies. And he died just as he reached the pinnacle.
This could tempt both subject and his biographer to produce a statuesque book, a North Korean monument to Dear Leader’s achievements. But instead of The Life and Miracles of Saint Steve, we get the gift of truth. We are forced to stare at the reality, or realities of the actual man. Thinking of his children, for whom Steve said the book was, so they got to better know him, this book is a great present. Judging oneself only by comparison to the better side of a parent is a terrible burden. Walt’s book gives them an independent look into the incredibly luminous Steve as well as into his sometimes repulsive dark side. Steve’s must have hoped to free them from his legend.
On the one hand, Isaacson shows the man who thrilled us with his (almost) unerring taste, with his sense that computers of various sizes and forms were more than merely utilitarian, that they were the objects, the vehicles of an evolving culture. Visionary, artist, leader, innovator… the list of meliorative words goes on, and rightly so: Steve was all these.
On the other hand, Isaacson manages the feat of being, by turns, empathetic, even affectionate and, in the next sentence, unblinkingly factual. The book will confirm everything you’ve heard about Steve’s unpleasant sides, and then some. When learning of his truly pathological eating habits, for example, you’ll wonder about his sanity. I don’t use the word pathological lightly: you’ll see how delusional Steve was when, for eight months, he refused surgery for his diagnosed pancreatic cancer, choosing instead a strict vegan diet, acupuncture and “herbal remedies, and occasionally a few other treatments he found on the Internet or by consulting people around the country, including a psychic”.
In a similar vein, you’ll read what Jony Ive, Apple’s Sr. VP of Design, Steve’s soulmate had to say about his dark side:
“… his way to achieve catharsis is to hurt somebody. And I think he feels he has a liberty and a license to do that. The normal rules of social engagement, he feels, don’t apply to him. Because of how very sensitive he is, he knows exactly how to efficiently and effectively hurt someone.”
Yes, that’s also the way Steve was. With everyone, family included.
Knowing or having known many of the characters in the book, I can vouch for its accuracy. But, even more important, I can vouch for its voice. Walt Isaacson got Steve right. He didn’t get intimidated, he wasn’t seduced into being a groupie, he didn’t get nauseated or angry. Instead, he delivered the truest rendition I’ve read of one of the most complicated people I’ve known.
His subject’s complexity didn’t rob Isaacson of his dry wit, such as this when observing Jobs after his liver transplant:
“As Jobs got better, much of his feisty personality returned. He still had his bile ducts.”
Or from recording memorable Bill Gates quotes such a this one:
“I’ve been predicting a tablet with a stylus for many years,” he told me. “I will eventually turn out to be right or be dead.”
(Not so fast, Bill, we love to have you and Ballmer around.)
In my view, the only way to keep one’s sanity when dealing with Steve was to stay ambivalent, to force oneself to harbor contradictory feelings about him. Easier said than done. In my case, over time, feelings of admiration and affection have taken over when watching the feats and the struggle. Reading Walt’s book was a helpful and, at times, painful reminder of who Jobs actually was.
[For a small compendium of Walt’s best-selling Steve Jobs bio reviews, look here.]
Related columns:
- Steve Jobs, The Rule Breaker TweetOh my god! Steve Jobs breaks rules… Fortune magazine cannot see the difference between artists and bean counters. Steve Jobs is on Fortune’s cover again: Apple has become the most admired company in America. Is this another PR job of “oral gratification”? If it is, it comes with bite marks or, in politically correct terms, [...]...
- Steve Ballmer not so gracious TweetBackground: this Sunday May 4th Microsoft withdrew its offer to buy Yahoo for $44.6bn. Saturday, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer had invited the two co-founder of Yahoo, Jerry Yang and David Filo for a final discussion. In a last move, Ballmer sweetened his proposal by $5bn, to $33 a share. Yang and Filo demanded $37. So, [...]...
- Seven statues for Steve Jobs TweetFor this week’s Monday Note, the plans was to calmly traverse the field of investment opportunities as redefined, upended is a better word, or narrowed, by what is shaping up as depression. I used to write recession or recession/depression but, now, even the Washington sages are now losing their calm. Today, they’re conceding: the bailout [...]...
- Fiction: How Steve Jobs Cuckolds AT&T TweetSteve shimmers into a bar, materializes next to Dan Hesse, Sprint’s CEO, crying in his mojito and whispers: I can fulfill your fondest dream. You’re the Devil, go away! No, I’m merely Steve Jobs and I want nothing to do with your soul or your chiseled body. Relax, it’s just about money. A little bit [...]...
- Steve Ballmer sees the end of media paper within 10 years TweetAsked about his outlook for the future of media by the Washington Post, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer answered this: “In the next 10 years, the whole world of media, communications and advertising are going to be turned upside down — my opinion. Here are the premises I have. Number one, there will be no media [...]...





15 Comments
As a vegetarian, yet I sell gourmet food products -go figure, I’m SHOCKED to hear that his strict vegan diet coupled with herbal medicine didn’t help to cure his cancer. What a disillusion. I never feared cancer, always feeling confident because I thought I knew that I could cure it with raw veganism. I’ve read books about nutrition.
(just teasing)
I was already sad about Steve’s death, now I’m sad about the vegan disillusion…
Thanks Jean-Louis for ruining my weekend!
“Reading Walt’s book was a helpful and, at times, painful reminder of who Jobs actually was.”
.
My wife ran off with her iPad this weekend so I haven’t seen more than a couple of paragraphs yet. But it seems that the reactions oscillated violently from “the book shows what an utter jerk he was” to the more balanced view you gave and then I saw his sister’s very touching eulogy that ran in the NYT.
.
What an amazing person!
Oops, left out the writer’s NYT Op-Ed that also tilted back towards Jobs being “ingenious,” seemingly an attempt to backpedal the way that many took his book. A very tightly compressed cycle at work here!
I wasn’t that impressed by the book to be frank. Yes there were some interesting personal history and some information about his family that had never seen the light of day but the rest of it seemed to be a compendium of previously published work.
Also, we knew Steve could be a jerk but at the same time what is true in Silicon Valley is that all of these talented people could go find other jobs at any time they wanted. Were they all masochists? He quotes Jony Ive about Jobs being cruel, yet doesn’t follow up and ask why Jobs was his best friend or why Tim Cook and the most talented leadership team in tech stayed with Apple all those years if Jobs was the raging maniac that the book described. Maybe he was, but then why did they stay? There is no insight into that. Isaacson seems to take pleasure in listing all the occasions that Jobs was mean to people and none of the reasons for which people liked or were loyal to him. I note how Tony Fadell when interviews on Techcrunch talked about how Jobs was really caring of his lowliest engineers and how when some of them had terrible health problems, Jobs would find out and take care of them. The WSJ had an article talking about the charities that the Jobs family gave to, millions of dollars apparently that came from Steve Jobs through his wife, yet Isaacson could only note that Jobs never visited his wife’s charity locations. It seems that Isaacson was determined to only write about Jobs’ personal failures and none of his successes.
And so many missed opportunities were in the book. The great quote from Bill Gates about breaking into the neighbour’s house, why didn’t he follow up and ask Jobs about his view on that when Jobs continued to say that Gates simply ripped off other people’s ideas? Why didn’t Isaacson put in the book what he later said in an later interview about the book that Jobs didn’t want to give Kottke pre-IPO stock because he simply wasn’t as valuable to Apple as were other engineers and didn’t think it would be fair regardless of his friendship, versus what he put in the book which suggested that Jobs somehow betrayed Kottke?
I guess that for those who knew nothing about Apple and Jobs, the book will be interesting. I found it to be lacking, missing many opportunities to get insight into Steve Jobs and excessively harsh without any nuance. Also, Isaacson doesn’t really understand technology it seems to me, so he really couldn’t put Apple or Jobs’ efforts in context. He could simply paraphrase others’ writings but it was shallow.
I have to say that I was disappointed in the book.
Jean-Louis, it would be interesting to learn of your personal experience with Steve in 1984. You are also part of the story, and part of History.
>to stay ambivalent
Thanks for sharing, including the personal stance.
/hh
The key to a successful biography is not in synthesizing a story from the various parts, but from letting the people who knew the subject (including the subject) express their opinions and to let the reader weave these into a reconstruction of the fabric of the subject. This requires a warts and all approach and means different readers will take what they wish from the biography. But that is how we treat people in real life. Opinions differ and are coloured by our interactions, perceptions and biases. Isaacson has down a great job with Steve Jobs and as someone who has followed Jobs from the early days of the Mac but was never in the same room, I found it enlightening. Hopefully, this will encourage readers to look into his other biographies (particularly Einstein).
A vegan diet is missing so many nutrients, it probably accelerated the course of cancer by hampering the immune system’s ability to kill the cancer.
I read many of Jobs/Apple unauthorized biographies in the past. To be honest I found them much milder and make me happier than this authorized one. I am reading it in Dutch actually. I became fed up with Steve who I love so much, what a pain in the …..
What I think is that Isaacson was not particularly a fan of Steve. I think that Isaacson want to break the legend of Steve do you think I am right Jean-Louis? I am reading this book from Isaacson who make me really sad. For example this is not true that Bill Gates had the same Idea to make a GUI, because Bill Gates never saw the Xerox mock up. It’s not fair to tell such a lie. Isaacson let us believe that Gates was playing Sweetie. The Mac development team invented everything, the GUI from scrap, the pointed device, windows one on each other, the mouse so as we know it, the trash, the fonts, etc… Bill Atkinson, George Crow, Chris Espinosa, Joanna Hoffman, Bruce Horn, Susan Kare, Andy Hertzfeld, Guy Kawasaki, Daniel Kottke, and Jerry Manock. These people and only them with Steve’s of course deserve our recognition, and not the team of Microsoft who steal shamelessly Apples Ideas for ever!
One comment – adoptees are not “abandoned at birth.” Given up to another family, yes, but usually not abandoned.
Abandoned suggests a basket on a doorstep. That’s not what’s involved in adoption now, nor was it so in 1955. Abandoned suggests that the baby is so much trash to be put out. Adoption is infinitely more complex than that, and the characterization of adoption as abandonment is a hurtful one.
Recent articles. I think this is the most beautiful in the world the article, there must be many people like it your works will get everyone recognized you is the best I will always support you
Yeah~~~~~~~~~~`This has nothing to do with layers. You can either individually select or window select objects to be isolated or hidden. Good!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you for this perspective — it helps me to better appreciate Isaacson’s book. Like many people, I think initially I have felt disappointed that the book is somewhat deficient as a history of Jobs’ work, in addition to being a biography of Jobs as a person. It seems that a truly comprehensive work would be capable of being both, but I’m starting to believe it’s quite enough just to have a last clear, objective view of Jobs’ life and personality, even if it oversimplifies him in some ways.
However, I don’t think anything anyone can say will make me more appreciative of Isaacson’s “dry wit” or his comprehension of technology. But that’s okay.
I think that Isaacson want to break the legend of Steve do you think I am right Jean-Louis? I am reading this book from Isaacson who make me really sad. Buy Azelex Online
his comprehension of technology. But
3 Trackbacks
[...] http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/10/30/steve%E2%80%99s-bio-a-personal-perspective/ Share this:DiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in Uncategorized by fozbaca. Bookmark the permalink. [...]
[...] The Genius of Jobs by Walter Isaacson 30.10.2011 Steve’s Bio: A Personal Perspective by Jean-Louis Gassée Comentar no [...]
[...] Gassée对这本书的评价,倒是颇为值得赞赏。Jean-Louis [...]