<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best of Curation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/</link>
	<description>Media, Tech &#38; Business Models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: référencement google gratuit</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-29134</link>
		<dc:creator>référencement google gratuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-29134</guid>
		<description>Salutation, Merci d avoir partagé cet article avec nous.  J&#039;ai vraiment apprecié de lire cette article. Amicalement,

agence de référencement http://referencementwebtutoriel.wordpress.com référencement google prix</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salutation, Merci d avoir partagé cet article avec nous.  J&#8217;ai vraiment apprecié de lire cette article. Amicalement,</p>
<p>agence de référencement <a href="http://referencementwebtutoriel.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://referencementwebtutoriel.wordpress.com</a> référencement google prix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MATTER: Returning to Long-Form Journalism - 10,000 Words</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-22127</link>
		<dc:creator>MATTER: Returning to Long-Form Journalism - 10,000 Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-22127</guid>
		<description>[...] exist around this premise (Longreads, The Atavist, Byliner, Longform, etc.) MATTER won&#8217;t be a curation service; rather, it will include original investigative reporting from their team of writers, some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exist around this premise (Longreads, The Atavist, Byliner, Longform, etc.) MATTER won&#8217;t be a curation service; rather, it will include original investigative reporting from their team of writers, some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Aziza</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-21185</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Aziza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-21185</guid>
		<description>Great post - although I have to applaude your discipline in actually going back and reading these articles.

My humble guest is that the majority of readers file the articles and never go back.  This makes the correlation between &#039;most saved&#039; to &#039;most read&#039; a little shaky.  Of course, that might not matter for your point however it&#039;s a fundamental difference.

What I think is a bigger and most interesting point is the intelligence we can now gather from web reading technologies:  they tell us who saves what, potentially, what&#039;s being read...and further what part of what content is being liked.  This should be both great and scary info for publishers...

Best
@brunoaziza</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; although I have to applaude your discipline in actually going back and reading these articles.</p>
<p>My humble guest is that the majority of readers file the articles and never go back.  This makes the correlation between &#8216;most saved&#8217; to &#8216;most read&#8217; a little shaky.  Of course, that might not matter for your point however it&#8217;s a fundamental difference.</p>
<p>What I think is a bigger and most interesting point is the intelligence we can now gather from web reading technologies:  they tell us who saves what, potentially, what&#8217;s being read&#8230;and further what part of what content is being liked.  This should be both great and scary info for publishers&#8230;</p>
<p>Best<br />
@brunoaziza</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.I.P. (Work In Progress) » Trends in digital journalism for 2012 &#124; The Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20816</link>
		<dc:creator>W.I.P. (Work In Progress) » Trends in digital journalism for 2012 &#124; The Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20816</guid>
		<description>[...] would suggest? Not necessarily. According to a ranking by Read It Later, which was quoted in Frédéric Filloux’s Monday Note, most saved contents (mainly editorials and new technologies-related contents) are less that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would suggest? Not necessarily. According to a ranking by Read It Later, which was quoted in Frédéric Filloux’s Monday Note, most saved contents (mainly editorials and new technologies-related contents) are less that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.I.P. (Work In Progress) » Trends in digital journalism for 2012 &#124; journalism blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20815</link>
		<dc:creator>W.I.P. (Work In Progress) » Trends in digital journalism for 2012 &#124; journalism blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20815</guid>
		<description>[...] would suggest? Not necessarily. According to a ranking by Read It Later, which was quoted in Frédéric Filloux’s Monday Note, most saved contents (mainly editorials and new technologies-related contents) are less that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would suggest? Not necessarily. According to a ranking by Read It Later, which was quoted in Frédéric Filloux’s Monday Note, most saved contents (mainly editorials and new technologies-related contents) are less that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.I.P. (Work In Progress) &#187; Trends in digital journalism for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20814</link>
		<dc:creator>W.I.P. (Work In Progress) &#187; Trends in digital journalism for 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20814</guid>
		<description>[...] would suggest? Not necessarily. According to a ranking by Read It Later, which was quoted in Frédéric Filloux’s Monday Note, most saved contents (mainly editorials and new technologies-related contents) are less that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would suggest? Not necessarily. According to a ranking by Read It Later, which was quoted in Frédéric Filloux’s Monday Note, most saved contents (mainly editorials and new technologies-related contents) are less that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.I.P. (Work In Progress) &#187; Quelles tendances pour 2012?</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20793</link>
		<dc:creator>W.I.P. (Work In Progress) &#187; Quelles tendances pour 2012?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20793</guid>
		<description>[...] présentation? Pas forcément. Selon le classement établi par Read it Later et mentionné dans la Monday Note de Frédéric Filloux, la majorité des articles sauvegardés &#8211; éditos ou des contenus liés aux nouvelles [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] présentation? Pas forcément. Selon le classement établi par Read it Later et mentionné dans la Monday Note de Frédéric Filloux, la majorité des articles sauvegardés &#8211; éditos ou des contenus liés aux nouvelles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Dr Dre Headphones</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20725</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Dr Dre Headphones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20725</guid>
		<description>good post,thank you share it,i like it very much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good post,thank you share it,i like it very much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el Factor 2: 16 de diciembre 2011 &#124; 2blog, el blog de 2shareworld</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20681</link>
		<dc:creator>el Factor 2: 16 de diciembre 2011 &#124; 2blog, el blog de 2shareworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20681</guid>
		<description>[...] The Best of Curation &#124; Monday Note [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Best of Curation | Monday Note [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily archive &#124; Chipcinnati</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20637</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily archive &#124; Chipcinnati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20637</guid>
		<description>[...] Bookmarked The Best of Curation &#124; Monday Note [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bookmarked The Best of Curation | Monday Note [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chano</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20625</link>
		<dc:creator>chano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20625</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry. Of course I meant Frédéric.
My apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry. Of course I meant Frédéric.<br />
My apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chano</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/12/11/the-best-of-curation/#comment-20624</link>
		<dc:creator>chano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4358#comment-20624</guid>
		<description>Frederic, Frederic....
You say &#039;For good measure, let’s say Apple is not the last entity to add features that kill value by removing ads; below the same NYT web page in normal and “Reader” mode:&#039;
You are suggesting that the value in modern journalism lies in the ads?
Are you really saying that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frederic, Frederic&#8230;.<br />
You say &#8216;For good measure, let’s say Apple is not the last entity to add features that kill value by removing ads; below the same NYT web page in normal and “Reader” mode:&#8217;<br />
You are suggesting that the value in modern journalism lies in the ads?<br />
Are you really saying that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
