Comments on: NYT Digital Lessons

By: binary options broker scams

binary options broker scams — Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:20:18 +0000

When I initially commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify
me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the same comment.

There has to be an easy method you are able to remove me from that service?
Thanks a lot!

By: ameliorer référencement web coût

ameliorer référencement web coût — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:53:15 +0000

Je vous souhaite un bon mercredi. En tout cas, je vais revenir vous rendre visite très prochainement. Merci,

réussir son référencement web http://agencereferencementbordeaux.wordpress.com référencement payant

By: New York Times paywall revenue will keep growing | Ezymagazines

New York Times paywall revenue will keep growing | Ezymagazines — Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:52:46 +0000

[...] system setup by the New York Times 15 months ago. So far, it works fine (see also a previous column NYT Digital Lessons). Thanks to its paywall, the NYT collects an average of 4,750 new subscribers each week. Even the [...]

By: Scott M78

Scott M78 — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:25:37 +0000

Fogot to put my website about crisis loans in the website field Here it is

By: Scott M78

Scott M78 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:07:12 +0000

Damian – i take it your joking right? If not welcome to 2012!

By: Damian B

Damian B — Fri, 04 May 2012 12:33:08 +0000

When will some genius invent a flashy widget to install custom amounts of ‘likes’ and ‘tweets’ onto a site, to give the impression that all that stuff actually means anything?

By: New York Times Digital Lessons | That Eric Alper

New York Times Digital Lessons | That Eric Alper — Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:00:22 +0000

[...] From Monday Note: [...]

By: MH

MH — Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:19:29 +0000

I always get a kick out of media and tech types describing how to make money off the rubes.

We need to be herded into registration silos so that we (the free audience) may first be “converted into registered users able to be thoroughly data-mined.” The implication is that there is value in our personal information, and yet the newspapers and their digital simulacrums don’t wish to trade our info for their content. They want us to pay twice, with our “real” money and our “info” money.

I note with a bit of angry irony that when Apple provided an opportunity to monetize the publishers’ content several of the newspapers and magazines balked at the deal because Apple would not share the subscriber data with the publishers. This ability to not make double sales through the control of subscriber data was a deal breaker. I also note that the ad people continue to escalate their war on the consumer by creating ever more toxic and persistent “cookies” that circumvent the user’s desired privacy settings, all at the behest of advertisers.

If this is the sort of “value add” that I get from using the NYT website, first, I scoff in their general direction, and second, I think I’ll just beg off. I don’t enjoy being treated as a mark to be fleeced.

By: The morning lowdown 4-23-12 — paidContent

The morning lowdown 4-23-12 — paidContent — Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:31:11 +0000

[...] NYT digital lessons (The Monday Note) [...]