<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s next for RIM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%E2%80%99s-next-for-rim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/</link>
	<description>Media, Tech &#38; Business Models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjun kanuri</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-44072</link>
		<dc:creator>arjun kanuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 10:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-44072</guid>
		<description>This site definitely has all the information and facts I needed concerning this subject 
and didn&#039;t know who to ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site definitely has all the information and facts I needed concerning this subject<br />
and didn&#8217;t know who to ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dymo</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-43806</link>
		<dc:creator>Dymo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 05:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-43806</guid>
		<description>I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I assumed this post used to be good. I do not recognize who you’re but definitely you are going to a well-known blogger if you happen to are not already. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I assumed this post used to be good. I do not recognize who you’re but definitely you are going to a well-known blogger if you happen to are not already. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-27364</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-27364</guid>
		<description>RIM appears to trade dramatically below liquidation value.

With market cap of ~$3.6B and TEV of ~$1.4B -- cash and investments plus net working capital accounts for 95% of the current market capitalization.

This excludes any value for net PP&amp;E or intellectual property.

So...for 5% of market cap - $180M - you get $2.7B of net PP&amp;E and a bunch of patents that are probably worthless but have a book value of $3.3B.  What are the chances that RIM&#039;s property, plant and equipment and all their intellectual property are worth more than $180M?  Given a book value of $6B, I&#039;d say the odds are good. 

Cash, investments, working capital, pp&amp;e, and intangibles = $9.4B at book value.  Market cap = $3.6B.  Throw all the inventory in the trash and donate the intellectual property to goodwill or a museum, and you&#039;re still at $5.1B.

This ignores the fact that some international markets are still quite strong and the company still produces cash.  Despite all the bad figures, RIM made $2.8B of operating cash flow in the twelve months ended June 2012 (that&#039;s 2x it&#039;s enterprise value).

If RIM&#039;s technology and franchise are hopeless, which it sounds like they are, then management is nefariously robbing its shareholders by chasing a lost cause.  

There is enough value in the assets and the cigarette butt of earnings to easily double or triple the market cap.

Blackstone or KKR should buy RIM and stop management&#039;s value destructive exploits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIM appears to trade dramatically below liquidation value.</p>
<p>With market cap of ~$3.6B and TEV of ~$1.4B &#8212; cash and investments plus net working capital accounts for 95% of the current market capitalization.</p>
<p>This excludes any value for net PP&amp;E or intellectual property.</p>
<p>So&#8230;for 5% of market cap &#8211; $180M &#8211; you get $2.7B of net PP&amp;E and a bunch of patents that are probably worthless but have a book value of $3.3B.  What are the chances that RIM&#8217;s property, plant and equipment and all their intellectual property are worth more than $180M?  Given a book value of $6B, I&#8217;d say the odds are good. </p>
<p>Cash, investments, working capital, pp&amp;e, and intangibles = $9.4B at book value.  Market cap = $3.6B.  Throw all the inventory in the trash and donate the intellectual property to goodwill or a museum, and you&#8217;re still at $5.1B.</p>
<p>This ignores the fact that some international markets are still quite strong and the company still produces cash.  Despite all the bad figures, RIM made $2.8B of operating cash flow in the twelve months ended June 2012 (that&#8217;s 2x it&#8217;s enterprise value).</p>
<p>If RIM&#8217;s technology and franchise are hopeless, which it sounds like they are, then management is nefariously robbing its shareholders by chasing a lost cause.  </p>
<p>There is enough value in the assets and the cigarette butt of earnings to easily double or triple the market cap.</p>
<p>Blackstone or KKR should buy RIM and stop management&#8217;s value destructive exploits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality distortion fields &#8211; stuff about things</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26762</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality distortion fields &#8211; stuff about things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26762</guid>
		<description>[...] effects of a reality distortion field. But from where I&#8217;m standing, I see that RIM has lost 95% of its value in 4 years and Microsoft can&#8217;t crack 10% mobile marketshare and as of last year was making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] effects of a reality distortion field. But from where I&#8217;m standing, I see that RIM has lost 95% of its value in 4 years and Microsoft can&#8217;t crack 10% mobile marketshare and as of last year was making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s not over until RIM says it&#8217;s over &#124; memeburn</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26694</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s not over until RIM says it&#8217;s over &#124; memeburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26694</guid>
		<description>[...] Gassée &#8212; ex-HP and Apple &#8212; is a brilliant man, but I disagree when he argues that RIM’s attempt at an entirely new platform with BlackBerry 10 is a waste of time, since newly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gassée &#8212; ex-HP and Apple &#8212; is a brilliant man, but I disagree when he argues that RIM’s attempt at an entirely new platform with BlackBerry 10 is a waste of time, since newly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26526</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26526</guid>
		<description>&quot;What would I do? I&#039;d shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What would I do? I&#8217;d shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26524</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26524</guid>
		<description>RIMM
Market Value = $3.9G
- $2.2G cash
- $1.0G for patent potfolio
= $700M for current value of ongoing business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIMM<br />
Market Value = $3.9G<br />
- $2.2G cash<br />
- $1.0G for patent potfolio<br />
= $700M for current value of ongoing business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade your geek with Houston Chronicle technology writer Dwight Silverman&#8230; &#124; Droidset</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26522</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrade your geek with Houston Chronicle technology writer Dwight Silverman&#8230; &#124; Droidset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26522</guid>
		<description>[...] What’s next for RIM? – The outlook is bleak, as neither an outright sale nor breaking the company into pieces makes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What’s next for RIM? – The outlook is bleak, as neither an outright sale nor breaking the company into pieces makes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade your geek with Houston Chronicle technology writer Dwight Silverman &#124; Acer 3G Chromebook</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26521</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrade your geek with Houston Chronicle technology writer Dwight Silverman &#124; Acer 3G Chromebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26521</guid>
		<description>[...] cars in a dozen cities via an app, but now it plans to use hybrid vehicles to lower the cost.• What’s next for RIM? – The outlook is bleak, as neither an outright sale nor breaking the company into pieces makes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cars in a dozen cities via an app, but now it plans to use hybrid vehicles to lower the cost.• What’s next for RIM? – The outlook is bleak, as neither an outright sale nor breaking the company into pieces makes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lundy</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26516</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t just RIM who is trouble. Nokia is looking at its contingency plans. http://aragonresearch.com/nokia-contingency-plan-rim-vs-android/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t just RIM who is trouble. Nokia is looking at its contingency plans. <a href="http://aragonresearch.com/nokia-contingency-plan-rim-vs-android/" rel="nofollow">http://aragonresearch.com/nokia-contingency-plan-rim-vs-android/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; What’s next for RIM? Gordon&#039;s shares</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26512</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; What’s next for RIM? Gordon&#039;s shares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26512</guid>
		<description>[...] Link. Oblivion. Or so Gasee seems to imply.    by jgordon on July 2, 2012 &#160;&#8226;&#160; Permalink  Posted in share Tagged s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link. Oblivion. Or so Gasee seems to imply.    by jgordon on July 2, 2012 &nbsp;&bull;&nbsp; Permalink  Posted in share Tagged s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26509</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26509</guid>
		<description>Great piece here. The only answer is to start stockpiling devices. Now, http://hashablemedia.com/kick-me-in-the-teeth-i-still-love-blackberry/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece here. The only answer is to start stockpiling devices. Now, <a href="http://hashablemedia.com/kick-me-in-the-teeth-i-still-love-blackberry/" rel="nofollow">http://hashablemedia.com/kick-me-in-the-teeth-i-still-love-blackberry/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wildstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26508</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wildstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26508</guid>
		<description>@j-lg The NTP settlement probably doesn&#039;t say too much about RIM&#039;s patent portfolio. NTP claimed a fundamental patent on the mail delivery system. RIM couldn&#039;t countersue, since NTP was non-practicing, and that left it unable to use patents defensively. The NTP affair speaks mainly to the incompetence of RIM&#039;s legal strategy, as others dealt successfully with NTP&#039;s claims for much less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@j-lg The NTP settlement probably doesn&#8217;t say too much about RIM&#8217;s patent portfolio. NTP claimed a fundamental patent on the mail delivery system. RIM couldn&#8217;t countersue, since NTP was non-practicing, and that left it unable to use patents defensively. The NTP affair speaks mainly to the incompetence of RIM&#8217;s legal strategy, as others dealt successfully with NTP&#8217;s claims for much less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Schulz</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26506</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Schulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 09:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26506</guid>
		<description>I believe BBM is getting way too much credit/value. The messaging service has been lapped several times by dozens of solid competitors including Kik, Whatsapp, Skype, iMessage, Groupme, Facebook Messenger (keep an eye on this)etc. 

BBM has bled users except perhaps overseas. 

Who will adopt BBM unless most of their contacts are using it (Hint:Hardly anyone)?

Carriers in the USA are moving away from SMS packages (See: Verizon new plans).

I believe BBM may have value for the technology but that it&#039;s far less than thought and not enough to make it a viable standalone entity. 

The big issue now for RIM is a sale to a non-friendly foreign based company will probably result in the loss of most or all government users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe BBM is getting way too much credit/value. The messaging service has been lapped several times by dozens of solid competitors including Kik, Whatsapp, Skype, iMessage, Groupme, Facebook Messenger (keep an eye on this)etc. </p>
<p>BBM has bled users except perhaps overseas. </p>
<p>Who will adopt BBM unless most of their contacts are using it (Hint:Hardly anyone)?</p>
<p>Carriers in the USA are moving away from SMS packages (See: Verizon new plans).</p>
<p>I believe BBM may have value for the technology but that it&#8217;s far less than thought and not enough to make it a viable standalone entity. </p>
<p>The big issue now for RIM is a sale to a non-friendly foreign based company will probably result in the loss of most or all government users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26505</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26505</guid>
		<description>Today, the fact is that I am unsatisfied with the Android ecosystem. And everybody else is, they just don&#039;t know it - yet (Jobs have said that). It&#039;s a mess, it&#039;s always pegged to EOM&#039;s crapware (except Nexus), it lets viruses come in no matter what, it comes with too many (fake/useless/virus) apps. Today&#039;s Android is to the smartphones what Win 95/98/NT/XP/7 was to computers: a nice enough, very functional OS which frustrates every single users nonetheless because of the dirty bloatware, viruses, bugs and failed updates.
Consumers are not stupid (I&#039;m no techie, I&#039;m a food pro but I used to love my BB). If tomorrow RIM pulls out a superior OS, and yes it&#039;s not that hard to do better than Android, RIM could rack up market shares again.
I&#039;m speculating, just like you guys are doing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the fact is that I am unsatisfied with the Android ecosystem. And everybody else is, they just don&#8217;t know it &#8211; yet (Jobs have said that). It&#8217;s a mess, it&#8217;s always pegged to EOM&#8217;s crapware (except Nexus), it lets viruses come in no matter what, it comes with too many (fake/useless/virus) apps. Today&#8217;s Android is to the smartphones what Win 95/98/NT/XP/7 was to computers: a nice enough, very functional OS which frustrates every single users nonetheless because of the dirty bloatware, viruses, bugs and failed updates.<br />
Consumers are not stupid (I&#8217;m no techie, I&#8217;m a food pro but I used to love my BB). If tomorrow RIM pulls out a superior OS, and yes it&#8217;s not that hard to do better than Android, RIM could rack up market shares again.<br />
I&#8217;m speculating, just like you guys are doing <img src='http://www.mondaynote.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26503</link>
		<dc:creator>jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26503</guid>
		<description>cascades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cascades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26499</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26499</guid>
		<description>JLG, I don&#039;t think this is &quot;sad&quot; at all. RIM&#039;s enterprise exchange server for mail (one of Blackberry&#039;s core competencies has always been email and messaging reliability) was too expensive for small businesses and startups to run. RIM didn&#039;t give a crap about helping startups, creating developer ecosystem, all they really wanted to do was cater to Corporate (name your company), Fortune (name your number), etc. So as someone making a comfortable living thanks to Steve Jobs, I shed absolutely zero crocodile tears for RIM and in fact thank I applaud Darwin, as the disruption has pushed the world ahead (which push would never have taken place had RIM continued to sit around on its tush).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JLG, I don&#8217;t think this is &#8220;sad&#8221; at all. RIM&#8217;s enterprise exchange server for mail (one of Blackberry&#8217;s core competencies has always been email and messaging reliability) was too expensive for small businesses and startups to run. RIM didn&#8217;t give a crap about helping startups, creating developer ecosystem, all they really wanted to do was cater to Corporate (name your company), Fortune (name your number), etc. So as someone making a comfortable living thanks to Steve Jobs, I shed absolutely zero crocodile tears for RIM and in fact thank I applaud Darwin, as the disruption has pushed the world ahead (which push would never have taken place had RIM continued to sit around on its tush).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qka</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26496</link>
		<dc:creator>qka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26496</guid>
		<description>What of QNX in the RIM breakup? It has a long history of being used in commercial real-time systems. The Wikipedia article you reference says &quot;As of September 12, 2007, QNX offers a license for non-commercial users.&quot;

Will QNX ever be again available for commercial users? 

Might that be a business worth spinning out of RIM, or being acquired by some company already in a related business, such as Harman International Industries who owned QNX before RIM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What of QNX in the RIM breakup? It has a long history of being used in commercial real-time systems. The Wikipedia article you reference says &#8220;As of September 12, 2007, QNX offers a license for non-commercial users.&#8221;</p>
<p>Will QNX ever be again available for commercial users? </p>
<p>Might that be a business worth spinning out of RIM, or being acquired by some company already in a related business, such as Harman International Industries who owned QNX before RIM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Louis Gassée</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26494</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Louis Gassée</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26494</guid>
		<description>@ ty_a: RIM had to pay a large patent infrigement settlement to NTP: $612M. With this in mind, not sure RIM has too many valuable patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ty_a: RIM had to pay a large patent infrigement settlement to NTP: $612M. With this in mind, not sure RIM has too many valuable patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Louis Gassée</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26493</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Louis Gassée</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26493</guid>
		<description>@ Fafnir: Yes, Canadian restrictions could be a problem. Will Canada&#039;s govt (conversative) want to pour money into Saving Private RIM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Fafnir: Yes, Canadian restrictions could be a problem. Will Canada&#8217;s govt (conversative) want to pour money into Saving Private RIM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Louis Gassée</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Louis Gassée</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26492</guid>
		<description>@ rd: You&#039;re right, of course, a slip of the pen. I didn&#039;t hear the reverse engineering rumor. Inneresting. 1,500+ APIs in iOS, quite a mountain to climb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ rd: You&#8217;re right, of course, a slip of the pen. I didn&#8217;t hear the reverse engineering rumor. Inneresting. 1,500+ APIs in iOS, quite a mountain to climb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rd</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26491</link>
		<dc:creator>rd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26491</guid>
		<description>&quot;When RIM acquired QNX from Harman International in 2012&quot;

It was 2010 not 2012.
RIM could have gone the incremental route of taking QNX and
combine with their Java stack but they didn&#039;t.
- However Playbook does use version of QNX but that didn&#039;t help in any way.
- Microsoft is out unless RIM can port their Java code.
- I think they also tried AIR route as well as HTML5 both didn&#039;t work.
- RIM still has shot with Intel and Oracle.  only question is can they get dual core procs, GPUs, LTE chips, screens, etc. cheaply.
- Everyone in the industry knows that all these guys are reverse
engineering Apple&#039;s APIs in clean room and no copyright suit is going to protect that.
(error fixed - thanks. FF)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When RIM acquired QNX from Harman International in 2012&#8243;</p>
<p>It was 2010 not 2012.<br />
RIM could have gone the incremental route of taking QNX and<br />
combine with their Java stack but they didn&#8217;t.<br />
- However Playbook does use version of QNX but that didn&#8217;t help in any way.<br />
- Microsoft is out unless RIM can port their Java code.<br />
- I think they also tried AIR route as well as HTML5 both didn&#8217;t work.<br />
- RIM still has shot with Intel and Oracle.  only question is can they get dual core procs, GPUs, LTE chips, screens, etc. cheaply.<br />
- Everyone in the industry knows that all these guys are reverse<br />
engineering Apple&#8217;s APIs in clean room and no copyright suit is going to protect that.<br />
(error fixed &#8211; thanks. FF)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fafnir</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26490</link>
		<dc:creator>Fafnir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 23:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26490</guid>
		<description>Another hurdle may be Canadian restriction on foreign ownership laws:
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/06/29/andrew-coyne-possible-sale-of-canadian-icon-rim-will-be-test-of-silly-foreign-ownership-laws/

Except RIM all the software of the smartphones companies headquarters are now based in the USA. Since this country is not immune to abuse of dominant position, just look at megaupload or even wikileak, why the rest of the world stay put? Or there are informations that we can yet access?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another hurdle may be Canadian restriction on foreign ownership laws:<br />
<a href="http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/06/29/andrew-coyne-possible-sale-of-canadian-icon-rim-will-be-test-of-silly-foreign-ownership-laws/" rel="nofollow">http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/06/29/andrew-coyne-possible-sale-of-canadian-icon-rim-will-be-test-of-silly-foreign-ownership-laws/</a></p>
<p>Except RIM all the software of the smartphones companies headquarters are now based in the USA. Since this country is not immune to abuse of dominant position, just look at megaupload or even wikileak, why the rest of the world stay put? Or there are informations that we can yet access?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobDK</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26488</link>
		<dc:creator>RobDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26488</guid>
		<description>At the original iPhone launch in January 2007, Steve Jobs said that the iPhone OS was 5 year ahead of any competitor.

And now, 5 years later almost to the week, Nokia issues a warning to investors outlining worsening losses, falling sales and mass firings, whilst RIM quarterly accounts show the first ever loss, falling sales and mass firings. 

Sounds like poetic justice to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the original iPhone launch in January 2007, Steve Jobs said that the iPhone OS was 5 year ahead of any competitor.</p>
<p>And now, 5 years later almost to the week, Nokia issues a warning to investors outlining worsening losses, falling sales and mass firings, whilst RIM quarterly accounts show the first ever loss, falling sales and mass firings. </p>
<p>Sounds like poetic justice to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ty_a</title>
		<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/07/01/what%e2%80%99s-next-for-rim/#comment-26487</link>
		<dc:creator>ty_a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=4808#comment-26487</guid>
		<description>RIM&#039;s only value is in defensive patents that a company like Google could buy.

My gut feeling is that RIM is dead very soon. The real question is, will anyone notice or care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIM&#8217;s only value is in defensive patents that a company like Google could buy.</p>
<p>My gut feeling is that RIM is dead very soon. The real question is, will anyone notice or care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
