Mobile’s Rude Awakening

 

Mobile audiences are large and growing. Great. But their monetization is mostly a disaster. The situation will be slow to improve, but the potential is still there — if the right conditions are met.    

This year, a major European newspaper expects to make around €16m in digital advertising revenue. The business is even slightly profitable. But there is a catch: while mobile devices now provide more than 50% of its traffic, advertising revenue from smartphones and tablets will only reach €1m. For this particular company, like many others, mobile advertising doesn’t work. It brings about 5% or 6% of what desktop web ads do — which, already, suffer from a 15 times cut in revenue when compared to print.

Call it a double whammy: Publishers took a severe hit by going digital in a way that compounded commoditization of contents with an endless supply of pages. The result is economically absurd: in a “normal” world, when audiences rise, advertising reaches more people and, as a result, rates rise. At least, that was the rule in the comfy world of print. No such thing in digital media. As many news sites experienced, despite double digit audience growth, CPMs (Cost per Thousand page impressions) actually declined over recent years. Fact is, this sector is much more sensitive to general economic conditions than to its extraordinary large adoption. And as if that wasn’t enough, publishers now take another blow as a growing share of their audience moves to mobile where money hasn’t followed… yet.

Granted, there are exceptions. Nordic media, for instance, benefit from an earlier and stronger mobile adoption (think Nokia and Ericsson, even before smartphones). Supported by many paid-for services, Scandinavian media houses extract a significant amount of profit from mobile. Similarly, Facebook mobile operations are faring quite well. According to the latest TBG Digital report, Click Through Rate (CTR) on ads placed on mobile News Feeds are 23 times higher than those displayed on the desktop version (respectively a CTR of 1.290% vs. 0.049%).

The digital mediasphere is struggling with mobile ads. In June, we went through most of the causes (see Jean-Louis’ note Mobile Advertising: The $20bn Opportunity Mirage). Problem is: there are still few signs of improvement. Inventories are growing, ad creativity remains at a low point (just look at the pixelated ads that plague the bottom of your mobile screens). As you can see below, programmatic buying is on the rise as this low-yield market remains vastly intermediated (click to enlarge):

– Too many middlemen? –

This results in the following eCPMs (effective CPM is the price advertisers are willing to pay for a given audience) as surveyed for different mobile platforms:

iOS iPad........... $0.90-$1.10
iOS iPhone......... $0.70-$0.80
Android Tablet..... $0.60-$0.70
Android Phones..... $0.40-$0.60

Advertising-wise, mobile is mostly a dry hole.

OK. Enough whining. Where do we go from here? What to expect in the next 18 months? How to build upon the inherent (and many) advantages offered by the mobile space?

For rate cards, we have some good news: prices on Android and iOS are converging upward as Android demographics are rising; soon, the two dominant mobile platforms will be in the higher price range. The value of ads is also likely to climb a little as screens gets better and larger, and as bandwidth increases: such improvements will (should) allow more visually attractive, more engaging ads. The ecosystem should also benefit from the trend toward more customized advertising. Ideally, promotional campaigns should be completely integrated and provide a carefully designed continuum within the three digital vectors: desktop web to be viewed at home or at the office; mobile formats for quick reading on the go; and tablet-friendly for a slower, more engaged, lean-back consumption (reading time is five or ten times higher on an iPad than on a PC). But, again, as long as creative agencies or media themselves do not commit adequate resources to such a virtuous chain, the value created will stay dangerously close to zero. (Those players better hurry up as a myriad of agile startups are getting ready to take control of this neglected potential.)

A few more reasons for being bullish on mobile. For instance, the level of personalization has nothing to do with what we see on the PC; a smartphone is not shared; it’s personal; and it’s the best vector to carry an intimate environment in which to create one’s dedicated social interaction system, transactional tools, entertainment selections (games, movies, books, TV series), etc. Mobile devices come with other, high potential features such as geolocation, ability to scan a bar-code — all favoring impulse buying. (This happened to me more than once: In a Paris bookstore, if the only copy left of a book I want is worn-off, or if the salesperson seems annoyed by my mere presence, I quickly scan the bare-code and order it from Amazon on the spot, right from the store. Apparently, I’m not the only one: about 20% of mobile users admitted they scanned a bar-code, or took a picture of a product in a store). And soon, these features will be supplemented by electronic wallet functions. Think about it: which marketeer wouldn’t dreamed of having access to such capabilities?

frederic.filloux@mondaynote.com

Be Sociable, Share!

Related columns:

  1. The New Faces of Digital Readers TweetFirst of all, note the evolving language: the term Online Readers is now passé as it morphed into Digital Readers. The shift reflects two trends: a broader range of device types and, in news consumption, the spectacular rise of mobility. Today, we’ll focus on a recent set of surveys that quantify these trends. And we’ll [...]...
  2. Mobile Advertising:
    The $20B Opportunity Mirage
    TweetThere are a lot of questions left to be answered about Facebook’s IPO fiasco, but one thing we know is this: As consumers shift their use of Facebook from PCs to smartphones, investors worry about lower mobile advertising revenues. Is this a temporary situation that will be remedied when usage patterns settle, or do investors [...]...
  3. The 2010 Media Watch List TweetNo predictions, just a few of many hot topics for the newborn year. Paywalls. 2010 could see a significant number of newspapers jumping into the paid-for option. Among the conditions to be met: - Grouping around a toll collector. It could be Journalism Online in the US, a big media group in Europe, or even [...]...
  4. Expanding Into New Territories TweetIn defining business strategies for modern medias such as online newspapers, the most difficult part is finding the right combination of revenue streams. Advertising, pay-per-view, flat fee… All are part of the new spectrum media companies now have to deal with. The gamut looks like this: As we can see, newspapers mostly consist of one [...]...

7 Comments

  1. Posted December 18, 2012 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    This Christmas if you wish you may put on the cap of Santa Claus. If you are wondering how then here goes the suggestion. Visit http://www.giftbasketsportugal.com.pt to place the order that will provide access to the land of Portugal.

  2. Posted December 21, 2012 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Flowers happen to be the most admirable gift option specially that have been brought to us by the courtesy of nature. Thus we always prefer to go for the flowers for any special day or occasion. The link http://www.giftbasketsmexico.com.mx has wonderful flower collections that are for Mexico.

  3. Denis
    Posted December 24, 2012 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    “Think about it: which marketeer wouldn’t dreamed of having access to such capabilities?”

    Probably none, but consider thinking about this: what kind of consumer will accept to read the smelly crap spewed by legacy news outfits in exchange for that much tracking and monitoring?

    Imo, this is all horseshit — if that. The truth of the matter is that legacy news outfits have rushed to ever newer lows in quality, in an effort to keep their costs down. In the past decade or so, they’ve been paying the price, and they’re heading the way of the dinosaurs as a result. Good riddance.

    I’d wager there will be three types of survivors. One will be like Business Insider and boast an impressive ability to output slimy click-baiting headlines with essentially zero content. Another will be more like Arment’s The Magazine, which sticks to aggregating compelling opinion pieces behind a paywall. The last will be the news agencies themselves — AP, Reuters, Bloomberg, AFP, etc. — which can monetize themselves by selling market data. Oh, and maybe a fourth: the likes of Le Canard Enchainé, which I wish actually offered an iPad app so I could read their delicious quips from abroad.

    News outfits such as Le Monde or Les Echos have no future whatsoever imho. Their utter uselessness has yet to dawn on them because they still have legacy subscribers that continue to miraculously maintain them afloat.

    Take an honest look at Le Monde’s site right now. It’s almost entirely blog posts and AFP articles posted either verbatim or barely transcribed with an ounce of context, alongside metric shit tons of ads. Not discontent of offering a repulsive website, they additionally offer an iPad app that is so bad that whoever designed it should get shot. Readers can (and do) read Reuters, AP and so forth on Yahoo News or Google News, without the clutter. Le Monde’s potential added value (the occasional opinion piece) is a notch above zero. They simply deserve to die; the faster, the better.

    Les Echos is admittedly more welcoming from a user experience standpoint, but barely more useful as a source of news. One gets more interesting stuff by following a few financial blogs and monitoring a handful of specialized blogs, user groups and forums (i.e. crowd sourced data).

    I’d like to make a bet. 50 years from now, and hopefully earlier, the business of being a journalist be very close to that of being a rock star today, except that they’ll cater to an elite few who actually pay for opinion pieces with no ads or tracking, and TV outlets who secure their occasional presence for a fee. They’ll live side by side with gazillions of Mechanical Turks or similarly outsourced canon fodder who feed worthless news sites akin to Business Insider, which will cater to the masses and run on ads. And they’ll all get their primary source of information from citizen journalists reporting for free on blogs and forums, the latter of which will be the primary source of Reuters and AP editors who monetize their presence by selling market data and syndication.

  4. Posted January 2, 2013 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Celebrations are incomplete without gifts. And when comes to gifts one can’t think of a better option other than flowers. Visithttp://www.freshflowersbangalore.com
    to check out their floral collection.

  5. Posted March 17, 2013 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    An intriguing communicating is actually designer consideration. I suppose that you need to compose many on this topic, it mightiness not certainly be a prejudice send but generally grouping usually are not enough for you to mouth about much matters. To your succeeding. Cheers like your Deploy Plugins » Somnangblogs.

  6. Posted May 16, 2013 at 8:21 am | Permalink

    Banner Printing is smart way for adverting to your business, also Graphics are available in HD resolution, and it’s really powerful display medium and fabric banners can be hanging using a rope, attached with Velcro, or stretched over a stand to fit every display situation.

  7. Posted May 24, 2013 at 7:18 am | Permalink

    Folder Printing is smart way for adverting to your business, also Graphics are available in HD resolution, and it’s really powerful display medium and fabric banners can be hanging using a rope, attached with Velcro, or stretched over a stand to fit every display situation.

7 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Mobile’s Rude Awakening (Monday Note)Call it a double whammy: Publishers took a severe hit by going digital in a way that compounded commoditization of content with an endless supply of pages. The result is economically absurd: in a “normal” world, when audiences rise, advertising reaches more people and, as a result, rates rise. At least, that was the rule in the comfy world of print. No such thing in digital media. As many news sites experienced, despite double-digit audience growth, CPMs (cost per thousand page impressions) actually declined over recent years. Fact is, this sector is much more sensitive to general economic conditions than to its extraordinary large adoption. And as if that wasn’t enough, publishers are now taking another blow as a growing share of their audience moves to mobile where money hasn’t followed … yet. Mobile audiences are large and growing. Great. But their monetization is mostly a disaster. The situation will be slow to improve, but the potential is still there — if the right conditions are met. [...]

  2. [...] Mobile’s Rude Awakening (Monday Note)Call it a double whammy: Publishers took a severe hit by going digital in a way that compounded commoditization of content with an endless supply of pages. The result is economically absurd: in a “normal” world, when audiences rise, advertising reaches more people and, as a result, rates rise. At least, that was the rule in the comfy world of print. No such thing in digital media. As many news sites experienced, despite double-digit audience growth, CPMs (cost per thousand page impressions) actually declined over recent years. Fact is, this sector is much more sensitive to general economic conditions than to its extraordinary large adoption. And as if that wasn’t enough, publishers are now taking another blow as a growing share of their audience moves to mobile where money hasn’t followed … yet. Mobile audiences are large and growing. Great. But their monetization is mostly a disaster. The situation will be slow to improve, but the potential is still there — if the right conditions are met. [...]

  3. [...] Oxpeckers Growing audiences, shrinking revenue: the economic absurdity of mobile ad rates for publishers - Frédéric Filloux [...]

  4. [...] Mobile's Rude Awakening (Monday Note)Call it a double whammy: Publishers took a severe hit by going digital in a way that compounded commoditization of content with an endless supply of pages. The result is economically absurd: in a “normal” world, when audiences rise, advertising reaches more people and, as a result, rates rise. At least, that was the rule in the comfy world of print. No such thing in digital media. As many news sites experienced, despite double-digit audience growth, CPMs (cost per thousand page impressions) actually declined over recent years. Fact is, this sector is much more sensitive to general economic conditions than to its extraordinary large adoption. And as if that wasn’t enough, publishers are now taking another blow as a growing share of their audience moves to mobile where money hasn’t followed … yet. Mobile audiences are large and growing. Great. But their monetization is mostly a disaster. The situation will be slow to improve, but the potential is still there — if the right conditions are met. [...]

  5. [...] digital media strategist Frédéric Filloux wrote this week: Mobile audiences are large and growing. Great. But their monetization is mostly a [...]

  6. [...] Digitalmanager der französischen Wirtschaftszeitung “Les Echos” in einer lesenswerten Analyse. Er kennt die Umsatzzahlen eines europäischen Verlags, der bei einer seiner Nachrichtenseiten [...]

  7. [...] Digitalmanager der französischen Wirtschaftszeitung “Les Echos” in einer lesenswerten Analyse. Er kennt die Umsatzzahlen eines europäischen Verlags, der bei einer seiner Nachrichtenseiten [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*