iPad Pro: The Missing Workflow

 

The iPad started simple, one window at a time, putting it in the “media consumption” category as a result. Over time, such category proved too narrow, the iPad did well in some content creation activities. Can the new 128 GB iPad continue the trend and acquire better workflow capabilities?

Last week, without great fanfare, Apple announced a new 128 GB version of its fourth generation iPad, a configuration popularly known as the “iPad Pro“. The “Pro” monicker isn’t official, but you wouldn’t know that from Apple’s press release:

Companies regularly utilizing large amounts of data such as 3D CAD files, X-rays, film edits, music tracks, project blueprints, training videos and service manuals all benefit from having a greater choice of storage options for iPad. 

Cue the quotes from execs at seriously data storage-intense companies such as AutoCAD; WaveMachine Labs (audio software); and, quirkily, Global Aptitude, a company that makes film analysis software for football teams:

“The bottom line for our customers is winning football games, and iPad running our GamePlan solution unquestionably helps players be as prepared as possible,” said Randall Fusee, Global Apptitude Co-Founder. 

The naysayers grumble: Who needs this much memory on a “media tablet”? As Gizmodo put it:

The new iPad has the same retina display as its brothers, and the same design, and the same guts, with one notable exception: a metric crap-ton of storage. More storage than any decent or sane human being could ever want from a pure tablet…

(Increased storage is…indecent? This reminds me of the lambasting Apple received for putting 1 — one! — megabyte of memory in the 1986 Mac Plus. And we all recall Bill Gates’ assertion that 640 Kbytes ought to be enough for anyone. He now claims that the quote is apocryphal, but I have a different recollection.)

Or maybe this is simply Apple’s attempt to shore up the iPad’s average selling price ($467, down 18% from the year ago quarter), which took a hit following the introduction of the lower-priced iPad mini. (What? Apple is trying to make more money?)

The critics are right to be skeptical, but they’re questioning the wrong part of the equation.

When we compare iPad prices, the Pro is a bargain, at least by Apple standards:

The jump from 16GB to 32GB costs $100. Another doubling to 64GB costs the same $100. And, on February 5th, you’ll get an additional 64GB for yet another mere $100. (By comparison, extra solid state storage on a MacBook costs between $125 and $150 per 64GB.)

We get a bit more clarity when we consider the iPad’s place in Apple’s product line: As sales of the Mac slow down, the iPad Pro represents the future. Look at Dan Frommer’s analysis of 10 years of Mac sales. First, the Mac alone:

This leads Dan to ask if the Mac has peaked. Mac numbers for the most recent quarter  were disappointing. The newer iMacs were announced in October, with delivery dates in November and December for the 21.5″ and 27″ models respectively. But Apple missed the Xmas quarter window by about a million units, which cut revenue by as much as $1.5B and margin by half a billion or so (these are all very rough numbers). We’ll probably never find out how Apple’s well-oiled Supply Chain Management machine managed to strip a gear, but one can’t help wonder who will be exiled to Outer Mongolia Enterprise Sales.

Now consider another of Dan Frommer’s graphs:

This is units, not revenue. Mac and iPad ASPs are a 3 to 1 ratio but, still, this paints a picture of a slow-growth Mac vs. the galloping iPad.

The iPad — and tablets in general — are usurping the Mac/PC space. In the media consumption domain, the war is all but won. But when we take a closer look at the iPad “Pro”, we see that Apple’s tablet is far from realizing its “professional” potential.

This is where the critics have it wrong: Increased storage isn’t “insane”, it’s a necessary element…but it isn’t sufficient.

For example, can I compose this Monday Note on an iPad? Answering in the affirmative would be to commit the Third Lie of Computing: You Can Do It. (The first two are Of Course It’s Compatible and Chief, We’ll be in Golden Master by Monday.)

I do research on the Web and accumulate documents, such as Dan Frommer’s blog post mentioned above. On a PC or Mac, saving a Web page to Evernote for future reference takes a right click (or a two finger tap).

On an iPad, things get complicated. The Share button in Safari gives me two clumsy choices: I can mail the page to my Evernote account, or I can Copy the URL, launch Evernote, paste the URL, compose a title for the note I just created, and perhaps add a few tags.

Once I start writing, I want to look through the research material I’ve compiled. On a Mac, I simply open an Evernote window, side-by-side with my Pages document: select, drag, drop. I take some partial screenshots, annotate graphs (such as the iPad Pro prices above), convert images to the .png format used to put the Monday Note on the Web…

On the iPad, these tasks are complicated and cumbersome.

For starters — and to belabor the obvious — I can’t open multiple windows. iOS uses the “one thing at a time” model. I can’t select/drag/drop, I have to switch from Pages to Evernote or Safari, select and copy a quote, and then switch back to the document and paste.

Adding a hyperlink is even more tortuous and, at times, confusing. I can copy a link from Safari, switch back to Pages, paste…but I want to “slide” the link under a phrase. I consult Help, which suggests that I tap on the link, to no avail. If I want to attach a link to a phrase in my document, I have to hit the Space key after pasting, go to Settings and then enter the text that will “cover” the link — perfectly obvious.

This order of operations is intuitively backwards. On a Mac (or PC), I select the target text and then decide which link to paste under it.

Things get worse for graphics. On the iPad, I can’t take a partial screenshot. I can take a full screenshot by simultaneously pressing the Home and Sleep buttons, or I can tap on a picture in Safari and select Save. In both cases, the screenshot ends up in the Photos app where I can perform some amount of cropping and enhancing, followed by a Copy, then switch back to Pages and Paste into my opus.

Annotations? No known way. Control over the image file format? Same answer. There’s no iPad equivalent to the wonderful Preview app on the Mac. And while I’m at it, if I store a Preview document in iCloud, how do I see it from my iPad?

This gets us into the more general — and “professional” — topic of assembling a trove of parts that can be assembled into a “rich” document, such as a Keynote presentation. On a personal computer, there are plenty of choices. With the iPad, Apple doesn’t provide a solution, there’s no general document repository, no iCloud analog to Dropbox or Microsoft’s Skydrive, both of which are simple to use, quasi-free and, in my experience, quite reliable. (One wonders: Is the absence of a Dropbox-like general documents folder in iCloud a matter of technology or theology?)

Simply throwing storage at the problem is, clearly, not enough to make the iPad a “Pro” device.  But there is good news. Some of it is anecdotal, such as the more sophisticated editing provided by the iPad version of iPhoto. The better news is that iOS is a mature, stable operating system that takes advantage of fast and spacious hardware.

But the best news is that Apple has, finally, some competition when it comes to User Experience. For example, tablets that run Microsoft or Google software let users slide the current window to show portions of another one below, making it easier to select parts of a document and drop them into another. (Come to think of it, the sliding Notifications “drawer” on the iPad and iPhone isn’t too far off.)

This competition might spur Apple to move the already very successful iPad into authentically “Pro” territory.

The more complex the task, the more our beloved 30-year-old personal computer is up to it. But there is now room above the enforced simplicity that made the iPad’s success for UI changes allowing a modicum of real-world “Pro” workflow on iPads.

JLG@mondaynote.com

Be Sociable, Share!

Related columns:

  1. iPad: Which way do you lean? TweetThe iPad is a strange animal—we don’t know where it fits, yet. Is it a laptop replacement? Is it an entertainment device? Can I do “real work” on it or is it merely a brobdingagian iPod Touch, a more colorful Kindle with better email and Web browsing? Spiritual traditions associate the angle of the spine [...]...
  2. iPad Media Apps: can do better TweetIt’s time for a first assessment of a few iPad media applications. To sum up: a) most are disappointing;  b) no need to worry. Instead of subjectively pointing fingers at hits and misses, let’s rise to a bird’s eye view and see if we can understand why some apps work and why others don’t. Then [...]...
  3. Wanna see my Japanese etchings — on my iPad? TweetThe frenzy surrounding Apple’s new product, the iPad, could give a new life to the old pickup line. I just got mine, that thing is an equal opportunity guy and chick magnet. Better than the proverbial (and fake) Ferrari car keys negligently dropped on the counter in a bar. Here, with the iPad, you can [...]...
  4. What happened to the iPad? Tweet  On October 23rd, Apple announced the widely expected iPad mini. The company also surprised most by also introducing a faster “4th generation” iPad, swiftly replacing the one launched on March 7th this year, seven and a half months ago. That same day, Tim Cook proudly proclaimed a an iPad milestone: 100 million shipped since [...]...
  5. iPad: Publishers look for the winning formula TweetAmong Australian media executives, like everywhere else, the talk of the town is the iPad. I was in Sydney this week, giving a talk at the Media 2010 conference. This gave rise to vibrant discussions of the ways in which the Apple device could transform our industry. Among the group of speakers, the most enthusiastic [...]...

29 Comments

  1. Horace the Grump
    Posted February 3, 2013 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Well argued. The iPad is not good for complex workflows as you have outlined for Monday Note…

    I wonder if some of the ‘theology’ had something to do with one S Forstall?

    Anyhow I hope that iOS7 is something of a ‘back to the iPad’ event where Apple brings some form of multiple windows and better cross application integration to the platform…

  2. Posted February 3, 2013 at 11:12 pm | Permalink

    Ironic that Apple pioneered Desk Accessories but no iPad can have them. Instead, Samsung did something like that for its tablets (which provoked laughs from naif iOS fanboys who apparently never heard of DAs, ever). It’s also Samsung to pioneer multi-windowing on a tablet — and a smartphone. It’s paired with a stylus right now, but perhaps Google will incorporate that into Android for stylus-less use. Hell, even my Palm III could give me access to two things at once, by the use of Hackmaster. I could be in a SmartDoc file and pop up Memos to refer to something from there. Some of the limitations of iOS on tablets are just maddening and retrogressive. It’s going from elegant simplicity to aggravating simplicity. Maybe this is Apple’s game. iOS Basic for the general public. Then “iOS Pro” that can do *real* work on more expensive hardware. Shades pf Windows RT and 8…

  3. Posted February 4, 2013 at 12:41 am | Permalink

    Hear! Hear!

  4. Posted February 4, 2013 at 1:38 am | Permalink

    I agree that the iOS model is very awkward for writing which involves analysis and linking across many sources.

    On annotation, Diigo is an alternative or supplement to Evernote for iOS Safari awa desktop browsers

    The Web Highlighter bookmarklet works well for iPhone and IPad tagging, highlighting and sticky notes, with referenced pages cached for searching
    http://www.diigo.com/tools

    Diigo also can be set to automatically log Twitter Favorites and index content of referenced URLs. I really like it for first level triage with iOS.

  5. Posted February 4, 2013 at 3:29 am | Permalink

    For the most part, these omissions are opportunities for clever app developers. We do need the OS itself to play nice to make for better creation tools and workflows. Even better plugin — like for evernote or scribefire — or bookmarklet handling would be welcomed.

    Google Chrome and Currents have additional sharing options beyond Safari’s. It’d be nice for Apple to provide this themselves.

  6. rd
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 5:02 am | Permalink

    “(One wonders: Is the absence of a Dropbox-like general documents folder in iCloud a matter of technology or theology?)”

    theology.
    Apple is trying to get rid of the filesystem completely.
    Steve Jobs several times said as much.
    Plus, Apple also doesn’t want to provide generic solution.

  7. Fafnir
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 6:27 am | Permalink

    Their marketing is smart. After several years of dominating the tablet’s market and selling zillions at a good financial margin, Apple is now providing the hardware to be able to respond to Microsoft’s suite. It may not be already at the pro level but it’s certainly become more than only a consulting tool.

  8. Walt French
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 7:11 am | Permalink

    My original skinny Mac came with programmers’ manuals and on the first page, I marveled how the 68K chip came with (rudimentary) memory protection, yet Apple explicitly had only aimed for a single-user, single-tasking OS. In 1985! I was outraged.
    .
    And it took years before they gave up gluing on kludges, axing a couple of over-ambitious plans, and buying Next for what became OSX. A challenging, nearly-fatal period.
    .
    Somehow, I think, This Time Is Different. Apple was able to add (or rather, expose) multi-tasking for the iOS user rather quickly after v1.0. I would like to think that Apple will determine what new interactions of apps will be easily managed by users, and the 10% unsatisfied—those who do what @JLG takes as necessary—will stay with OSX.
    .
    And yet, Apple thinks it’s ready to move the simplified, more streamlined workflow into the Enterprise. This is an interesting, no more end-running but a full-frontal re-engagement with Microsoft…something like 17 years after Jobs told enthusiasts to “forget it—the PC Wars are over and Apple lost.”
    .
    128GB of storage is clearly NOT enough to win a share of the business market, nor keep more adept individual consumers from buying a Win8 tablet. That seems so much a truism that I can’t imagine why Apple bothered, save for the fact that they’ve had 2+ years to plot a rejoinder to the Microsoft effort.
    .
    Popcorn time, coming up!

  9. Posted February 4, 2013 at 7:49 am | Permalink

    All this “pro” talk makes me wonder when Apple will get its head out of its *** and actually support the Pro users who supported Apple, not too long ago.

    I mean, there is no reason why Apple should fail to support pro users – even though they may only make up a market size (for Apple) of about 3 million in the US. It is good to have bragging rights and even better to back this up with real world stuff.

    I think some of the issue is that Apple, like many companies, fail to realize that in some areas making a small profit can be much better than making a large profit in other areas.

    You have your bread & butter… you also have your back bone. All of this iOS, Mac OS tech came from NeXT and Darwin. Certainly the Apple fore the second coming was way out of focus – a listless ship wander in treacherous waters, but now Apple could be making the other error – being way to focused on things that may only prove to generate large and short term returns.

    iOS can make Mac OS X better … but not with 10.7 – where they had a brain tumor for breakfast… though Microsoft always has to one up Apple. Remember Apple came out with “OS X” … so circa 2002 Microsoft comes out with OS XP … Well Windows XP, but you get the point and XP might have actually been Microsoft first real OS, since NT4 was kind of stable but not as friendly as W’98. Still, the desktop game is mostly over – desktop/laptop ‘full computers’ will be around for some time, but they will be come niche to the markets that need massive processing and have complex workflows.

    And where is OS X server? Where is the server hardware? Why does Apple kill their pro and server lineup after building that side of the business for 10 years? WTF? Steve may have been a design genius and he had some good skills to say no at certain times, but maybe the Woz should be in charge. He always built powerful system that were smart and elegant – easy to use.

    Now its all up to Ive & Co … Maybe Ive can take the best of Jobs and blend it with the best of the Woz and Apple will be on top again – for real.

  10. Posted February 4, 2013 at 8:46 am | Permalink

    I do 100% of my Blogging on iPad. I use the WordPress iOS app and some safari bookmarklets. And markdown.

    I agree that iOS lacks a perfect blogging app but that’s not an indication you couldn’t create. I do.

  11. Doug Grinbergs
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 9:06 am | Permalink

    Even at 6.x, iOS is, IMHO, still pretty raw and, in some ways, quite unusable, especially for a power user. (:-( I’ll not take this opportunity to get on a soapbox about all the things I dislike, if not hate, about iOS; suffice it to say, I remain disappointed with what Apple’s UI team is releasing to the masses for the tablet/phone OS.

  12. Jon T
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    Hi,

    One App I’ve recently discoveredis the Dolphin Browser App. It has built in functionality to clip whole or parts of web pages straight to Evernote and also and annotation option when clipping. It may help with some of the problems you’re having.

    I am in no way associated with the App but its made my browsing/data collection a whole lot easier for my blog.

    I do agree though, trying to use the iPad for proper business use and all you need to do in that arena can be a pain, I agree with Steve that it’s an opportunity for App developers but the best thing would be for Apple to open up the system a bit more. Without a central file store it’s always going to be difficult.

  13. Hamranhansenhansen
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    I think there is a misunderstanding at the heart of this post. In the 1990′s, you could maybe say that pro computing was business computing but that is no longer the case. Business people are about half on Windows XP. They represent the lowest of low-end computer users today. Most people with XP who try an iPad don’t look back. They had a 20GB hard disk in their XP machine with 10 GB free, so the 15 GB free on an iPad mini seems large. I have seen that again and again since iPad shipped.

    There are professional audio mixers that are missing all of their knobs and sliders and in place there is an iPod dock. Nobody needs to put multiple windows and a spreadsheet on that iPad to make it part of a professional workflow. The workflow that iPad is part of transcends computers. You see the same in medicine, where they have never had a personal computer that suited before iPad. From a music or medical perspective, iPad is the first *professional* computer we’ve seen. Everything in music is touch-based. Everything in medicine is pressed for time. You want a touch computer that reacts to you immediately, that is the first step.

    But if you want to make iPad part of a professional computer workflow, the way to do it is add a Mac as an accessory. For example you can write software on the Mac and run it on iPad, both native and Web software, including eBooks. You can run pro audio software on a Mac and control it wirelessly with an iPad. You can write on the iPad while you research on the Mac.

    In other words, the “iPad Pro” you are looking for is a Mac+iPad. That is iPad Pro. I would say to anyone who has a Mac, add an iPad to it, even if just a mini. The two devices together are more than the sum of their parts.

    As for the 128 GB of storage, that is long overdue. There are iPads in audio, video, databases, that are full up. I hope to see Apple double all the storage this year also, because the interactive books that we make with iBooks Author are surprisingly large for a 16 GB iPad. I would like to see users with more storage so that they can buy more content.

  14. Glynn Davies
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    Well argued article. However, as you point out, “the ‘Pro’ monicker isn’t official”. Though professional applications of the iPad have emerged, as far as I understand it neither the device nor its software is explicitly designed for them. Certainly, I don’t think Apple believe that more storage by itself moves a device from consumer to professional market.

    The comment above makes an excellent point, too. A tablet is probably always going to be an accessory to a desktop for most professional and probably a lot of consumer applications, at least for now.

  15. srikanth
    Posted February 4, 2013 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    To me it look more like the advance response to surface Pro. I’ve started worry that iPad capability is limited when compared to Pro.

  16. Jerry Ballard
    Posted February 5, 2013 at 1:19 am | Permalink

    hmmm… Reminds me of someone once saying that no one would ever need more than 640K of memory. Can’t remember who offhand.

  17. Walt French
    Posted February 5, 2013 at 6:05 am | Permalink

    @srikanth, in one word, YES. iPad is limited in comparison to the Surface.

    That’s a feature, not a bug.

  18. Canucker
    Posted February 5, 2013 at 6:23 am | Permalink

    While tablets are still young, Apple has been maturing the hardware. Unlike PCs, the differentiator will be primarily software/ecosystem (ditto for phones). This will cause issues for OEMs of tablet hardware as there is little room to differentiate on specs or even looks. A tablet is glass, battery and software. By pushing memory to 128 Gb, Apple quietly sets the upper end in its wide range while others fight for the low end. And that will not end well for anyone not hooked into profits from services (e.g. Amazon). Microsoft paying $2 billion to help take Dell private is either a Hail Mary for the old PC model, or a Hail Mary for the new tablet model. Either way, Microsoft is praying for miracles.

  19. Posted February 5, 2013 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    The best iPad Pro is actually a hybrid Win 8 tab\ultrabook. This is written on a 128GB ATIV which supports all the workflows above with real apps like office, even (at a pinch) full blown CAD like AutoCAD or Autodesk Revit

  20. Eddie V.
    Posted February 5, 2013 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    One thing you omitted in this otherwise well written post, is the developers themselves. Currently you can not write code for an iPad on an iPad (I.e., write code and compile such as with dev tools like Xcode). And no, developers are not yet ready to compile elsewhere on the “cloud” or some wacky dacky idea like that. So please wake me up when the day comes that Apple releases Xcode and I can get LLVM and other dev tools (not just compilers but also GUI design tools and so on, as well as Terminal app and oh heavens, even root access?). So until that day comes, the Mac won’t die. There are all sorts of really stupid ideas / rumors floating around these days that the Mac is dead and will be dropped entirely from Apple soon (yeah fat chance, do these imbeciles really think Apple is going to kill off Macs and thus stop providing OS X developer tools?). Oh and by the way, a friend of mine just got the 27″ iMac and loves it! The display is huge, gorgeous and works great for his needs for looking at big spreadsheets and using Powerpoint. So when will the iPad Pro have a powerful enough graphics processor to not just video mirror or AirPlay but capable of driving, say, a 27″ external display for viewing large amounts of information in a “data drenched” world we live in. So for all those “Mac is dead” doodads, keep on dreaming …

  21. Karthik
    Posted February 11, 2013 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Another feature/s that’s waiting in the “to be added” list on iOS is multiple accounts and individual App locking.

    iOS first came to public on a phone. So it’s ok to assume there might not be sharing of devices between families or even work groups. With iPads it would make a lot of sense to be able to lock Mail or other stock / finance Apps that you don’t want everyone to see. Same goes with multiple accounts.

  22. Posted February 11, 2013 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Hi. I+m the technology adviser of an organization with +1500 users.The most important feature in a future iPad Pro is Spotlight pro level.
    All business users use imap and/or exchange email, an they need to use spotlight to search email texts, subjects, senders and receivers stored in iPad and in the email server.
    According to our business users feedback in OS 6.1. this feature is limited and not precise compared with Mac OS.According to our users this is the killer feature to get iPad in to business environment.

  23. Posted February 15, 2013 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    An iPod Pro can’t be more than one pound in weight.

  24. DesDizzy
    Posted February 16, 2013 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    This is a curious article. I suppose it boils down to “specialists’ v “generalists”. Should you have one item that does all things poorly or should you have many items that do a few things well. Do I want to go jogging with an iPad or laptop? Clearly not! Do I want to write a novel on an iPhone? Clearly not. Within the constraints of current/future tech, there will be no “perfect” device on which it is possible to be all things to all people.

    I presume, that as processing power improves and gets cheaper, things like multi-tasking and multiple windows on small form devices will happen. However, in tech, there is no such thing as a free lunch. There is a trade-off for complexity.

  25. Posted March 9, 2013 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice
    while you amend your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog
    website? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little
    bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  26. Posted April 19, 2013 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It actually used to be a
    leisure account it. Glance complicated to far added agreeable from you!
    However, how can we keep up a correspondence?

  27. Posted May 6, 2013 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    I do believe all of the ideas you’ve presented for your post. They’re very convincing and will certainly work.

    Still, the posts are very quick for starters. Could you
    please lengthen them a bit from next time? Thank you for the post.

  28. Posted May 6, 2013 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Hello there! This is my 1st comment here so I just
    wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading your blog
    posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics?
    Thank you so much!

  29. Posted May 28, 2013 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    I know this web site gives quality dependent content and extra
    information, is there any other site which offers such stuff in quality?

11 Trackbacks

  1. By ‘The Missing Workflow’ — The Brooks Review on February 5, 2013 at 1:33 am

    [...] ‘The Missing Workflow’ Originally posted for members on: February 4, 2013 In his recent Monday Note Jean-Louis Gassée laments about the things that are far too cumbersome to do on an iPad: [...]

  2. By Is there an iPad Pro in Apple’s future? | Master on February 7, 2013 at 5:14 pm

    [...] Louis Gassée, a former Apple executive, founder of Be Inc. and venture capitalist, sums up Apple’s “pro” problem in his attempt to use an iPad to write his recent Monday Note column: Share [...]

  3. [...] Louis Gassée, a former Apple executive, founder of Be Inc. and venture capitalist, sums up Apple’s “pro” problem in his attempt to use an iPad to write his recent Monday Note [...]

  4. [...] Louis Gassée, a former Apple executive, founder of Be Inc. and venture capitalist, sums up Apple’s “pro” problem in his attempt to use an iPad to write his recent Monday Note [...]

  5. By Is there an iPad Pro in Apple’s future? – CNET on February 8, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    [...] Louis Gassée, a former Apple executive, founder of Be Inc. and venture capitalist, sums up Apple’s “pro” problem in his attempt to use an iPad to write his recent Monday Note [...]

  6. By Making the argument for a real iPad Pro | AppleTell on February 9, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    [...] and therefore productivity and efficiency.In his Monday Note column this week, entitled “iPad Pro: The Missing Workflow,” Jean Louis Gasseé—former senior Apple executive and founder of Be, Inc.—analizes the [...]

  7. By Professional Grade — Shawn Blanc on February 16, 2013 at 12:13 am

    [...] But I think it’s fair to say that the general perception of the iPad as a legitimate work device just isn’t there yet. [...]

  8. By The iPad’s Failing «Elia Insider Elia Insider on February 26, 2013 at 5:02 pm

    [...] of interesting pieces lately on the viability of the iPad as a productivity tool. The first, called The Missing Workflow, outlines how creating a simple blog post is very complicated on an iPad: For example, can I [...]

  9. [...] Louis Gassée, a former Apple executive, founder of Be Inc. and venture capitalist, sums up Apple’s “pro” problem in his attempt to use an iPad to write his recent Monday Note [...]

  10. [...] Jean Louis-Gassée backs this up with an article on why iPad just isn’t up-to-snuff as a professional tool. ”But when we take a closer look at the iPad ‘Pro’, we see that Apple’s tablet is far from realizing its ‘professional’ potential. … The more complex the task, the more our beloved 30-year-old personal computer is up to it. But there is now room above the enforced simplicity that made the iPad’s success for UI changes allowing a modicum of real-world ‘Pro’ workflow on iPads.” [...]

  11. [...] Jean Louis-Gassée backs this up with an article on why iPad just isn’t up-to-snuff as a professional tool. ”But when we take a closer look at the iPad ‘Pro’, we see that Apple’s tablet is far from realizing its ‘professional’ potential. … The more complex the task, the more our beloved 30-year-old personal computer is up to it. But there is now room above the enforced simplicity that made the iPad’s success for UI changes allowing a modicum of real-world ‘Pro’ workflow on iPads.” [...]