Google’s Red Guide to the Android App Store

 

As they approach the one million apps mark, smartphone and tablet app stores leave users stranded in thick, uncharted forests. What are Google and Apple waiting?

Last week, Google made the following announcement:

Mountain View, February 24th, 2013 — As part of an industry that owes so much to Steve Jobs, we remember him on this day, the 58th anniversary of his birth, with great sadness but also with gratitude. Of Steve’s many achievements, we particularly want to celebrate the Apple App Store, the venerable purveyor of iPhone software. 

Introduced in 2008, the App Store was an obvious and natural descendant of iTunes. What wasn’t obvious or foreseen was that the App Store would act as a catalyst for an entire market segment, that it would metamorphose the iPhone from mere smartphone to app phone. This metamorphosis provided an enormous boost to the mobile industry worldwide, a boost that has benefitted us all and Google more than most.

But despite the success of the app phone there’s no question that today’s mobile application stores, our own Google Play included, are poorly curated. No one seems to be in charge, there’s no responsibility for reviewing and grading apps, there’s no explanation of the criteria that goes into the “Editors’ Picks”, app categorization is skin deep and chaotic.

Today, we want to correct this fault and, at the same time, pay homage to Steve’s elegant idea by announcing a new service: The Google Play Red Guide. Powered by Google’s human and computer resources, the Red Guide will help customers identify the trees as they wander through the forest of Android apps. The Red Guide will provide a new level of usefulness and fun for users — and will increase the revenue opportunities for application developers.

With the Google Play Red Guide, we’ll bring an end to the era of the uncharted, undocumented, and poorly policed mobile app store.

The Red Guide takes its name from another great high-tech company, Michelin. At the turn of the 20th century, Michelin saw it needed to promote automotive travel in order to stimulate tire sales. It researched, designed and published great maps, something we can all relate to. To further encourage travel, Michelin published Le Guide Rouge, a compendium of hotels and restaurant. A hundred years later, the Michelin Red Guide is still considered the world’s standard; its inspectors are anonymous and thus incorruptible, their opinions taken seriously. Even a single star award (out of three) can put an otherwise unknown restaurant on the map — literally.

Our Red Guide will comprise the following:

- “Hello, World”, a list of indispensable apps for the first time Android customer (or iPhone apostate), with tips, How-To guides, and FAQs.
- “Hot and Not”. Reviews of new apps and upgrades — and the occasional downgrade.
- “In Our Opinion”. This is the heart of the Guide, a catalogue of reviews written by a select group of Google Play staff who have hot line access to Google’s huge population of in-house subject matter experts. The reviews will be grouped into sections: Productivity, e-Learning, Games, Arts & Creativity, Communication, Food & Beverage, Healthcare, Spirituality, Travel, Entertainment, Civics & Philanthropy, Google Glass, with subcategories for each.

Our own involvement in reviewing Android apps is a novel — perhaps even a controversial — approach, but it’s much needed. We could have taken the easy path: Let users and third-parties provide the reviews. But third party motives are sometimes questionable, their resources quickly exhausted. And with the Android Store inventory rapidly approaching a million titles, our users deserve a trustworthy guide, a consistent voice to lead them to the app that fits.

We created the Red Guide because we care about our Android users, we want them to “play safe” and be productive, and we feel there’s no better judge of whether an application will degrade your phone’s performance or do what it claims than the people who created and maintain the Android framework. For developers, we’re now in a position to move from a jungle to a well-tended garden where the best work will be recognized, and the not-so-great creations will be encouraged to raise their game.

We spent a great deal of time at Google identifying exactly the right person to oversee this delicate proposition…and now we can reveal the real reason why Google’s Motorola division hired noted Macintosh evangelist, auteur, and investor Guy Kawasaki as an advisor: Guy will act as the Editor in Chief of the Google Play Red Guide.

With Guy at the helm, you can expect the same monkish dedication and unlimited resources we deployed when we created Google Maps.

As we welcome everyone to the Google Play Red Guide, we again thank Steve Jobs for his leadership and inspiration. Our algorithms tell us he would have approved.

The Red Guide is an open product and will be published on the Web at AppStoreRedguide.com as well as in e-book formats (iBookstore and Kindle formats pending approval) for open multi-platform enjoyment.
——– 

No need to belabor the obvious, you’ve already figured out that this is all a fiction. Google is no better than Apple when it comes to their mobile application store. Both companies let users and developers fend for themselves, lost in a thick forest of apps.

That neither company seems to care about their online stores’ customers makes no sense: Smartphone users download more apps than songs and videos combined, and the trend isn’t slowing. According to MobiThinking:

IDC predicts that global downloads will reach 76.9 billion in 2014 and will be worth US$35 billion.

Unfortunately, Apple appears to be resting on its laurels, basking in its great App Store numbers: 40 billion served, $8B paid to developers. Perhaps the reasoning goes like this: iTunes served the iPod well; the App Store can do the same for the iPhone. It ain’t broke; no fix needed.

But serving up music and movies — satisfying the user’s established taste with self-contained morsels of entertainment — is considerably different from leading the user to the right tool for a job that may be only vaguely defined.

Apple’s App Store numbers are impressive… but how would these numbers look like if someone else, Google for example, showed the kind of curation leadership Apple fails to assert?

JLG@mondaynote.com

Be Sociable, Share!

Related columns:

  1. Science Fiction: An Apple-Curated App Store TweetIn an alternate universe, Apple has announced the App Store Guide and Blog. Choice morsels from the PR material follow. “We came to realize that a quarter million apps meant worse than nothing to Apple users”, said Apple’s CEO. “I get confused too! Reviews are often fake, lame, or downright incompetent. PR firms have been [...]...
  2. Droid and Android TweetLast Friday November 6th, the much-awaited Motorola Droid came out. Powered by the latest version of Google’s smartphone OS, Android 2.0, the new handset is exclusively distributed by Verizon. The carrier backs Motorola’s handset with an aggressive marketing campaign on its website and on TV ads. For such a “gifted” (Motorola + Verizon + Google) [...]...
  3. Android Week TweetSomething to keep our mind off the Wall Street catastrophe. Who knows, we might be on the verge of a “nuclear winter” as the Bush administration wakes up to another consequence of its intellectual shallowness, of its inability to understand that for markets to be really free they need to be regulated with an effective, [...]...
  4. Android: First Impressions TweetLet’s forget, for a moment, the sublime irony at the end of the W years, the right-wing neocons’ parting gift: a socialistic, state-owned financial system. Too depressing. . Instead, let’s take a first look at Android, the latest entry in the most dynamic segment of the high-tech industry, smartphones.  (The nice folks at T-Mobile will [...]...
  5. Mac App Store: Soon But Controversial Tweetby Jean-Louis Gassée This year, three wishes were on top of my list: A smaller, lighter MacBook, an app store for the Mac, and a curated iOS app store. I got two out of three. The 11” MacBook Air works quite well when the passenger in front of me fully reclines his seat; and Apple, [...]...

15 Comments

  1. NormM
    Posted March 3, 2013 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    “But despite the success of the app phone there’s no question that today’s mobile application stores, our own Google Play included, are poorly curated.”

    Hasn’t the main complaint with Apple and contrast with Google been that the Apple App store is a curated walled garden, while the Google store is a free for all? And Apple bought Chomp a year ago, to help improve App store discovery. Doesn’t that count at all? Obvously they need to do better, but it seems a bit unfair to say that Apple and Google have been exactly the same, and now this puts Google ahead!

    Besides, Apple doesn’t advertise what it’s doing until products are ready to be released, so what makes you think that it’s “resting on its laurels?”

  2. Jean-Louis Gassée
    Posted March 4, 2013 at 1:46 am | Permalink

    @ NormM: You’re right, we don’t know what Apple is up to. In my case, I praise their discretion, their discipline.
    My (satirical) intent was, in passing, to point to Google’s “admiring emulation” of Apple products, not to say they do a better job than Apple.
    I wrote two previous MNs on the same topic. In September 2010 http://j.mp/XCll0O and in January 2012 http://j.mp/A1gCk8
    The great iOS App Store is now (almost) 5 years old, still without real curation, without the kind of guide that would make it more helpful to users and developers — Chomp notwithstanding.

  3. rd
    Posted March 4, 2013 at 2:51 am | Permalink

    I though google didn’t want to curate anything but recommend
    by tracking every moment of your time and selling you
    as advertisement.

    Google is conflicted in that it wants Web Apps not native Apps
    that Apple is pushing.

    If you want Apple to use Google like Algorithms then Apple
    has to act just like Google. I don’t want any kind of genius
    algorithm tracking me or advertise anything.

    Apple can’t do anything against SEO going on in AppStore,
    or copy cats, fraud-esters because then it would eliminate
    competitors and FTC will go after them again.

  4. Kraftyman
    Posted March 4, 2013 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Apple has established a developer program, set technical boundaries ( even if some disagree about those boundaries) about what is allowed on iOS devices. They have also set some (more nebulous, perhaps)boundaries about the content of apps. These are not out of keeping with what other shopkeepers do in their corner stores or large department store chains.
    I don’t think it is reasonable to expect apple to be the classifier, reviewer, curator and marketer of apps for their developers. There already exists a vibrant industry of magazines, fan websites and professional groups who do this sort of work. The type of curation/critique JLG seems to be asking for is best done outside the App Store.

    The people who don’t know what they are looking for in an app in the first place are probably not going to be happy with what they find. The sea of cheap and nasty apps is a direct consequence of how accessible the developer program has become. The best of breed apps are not hard to find. It can be frustrating that demo apps are prohibited and upgrading is inflexible, but plenty of apps are offered as “lite” versions to allow a taste.

  5. airmanchairman
    Posted March 4, 2013 at 10:40 am | Permalink

    Easier said than done, given the plethora of languages, countries, genres, and developers” varying ethical proclivities and originality (or lack thereof).

    Given time, a measure of self-curation will happen when the “gold-rush” mentality dies down and the grifters drift off to the next new big scam area; it will give new methodologies the time and space to bear fruit and be of value to the consumer.

  6. Alexi Orm
    Posted March 4, 2013 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    If anyone ought to know about curation at Apple it should be R.J. Pittman, who jumped ship from Google and cross over to Apple and is currently “head of WW E-Commerce Platform” at Apple . So c’mon RJ, get your groove on with JLG’s suggestion!

  7. David Olson
    Posted March 4, 2013 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    There is a need for a change in the very model of the App Store. You wrote a fictional letter that rings true of the old Google (perhaps one only of my old imagination) that would do something radical that truly made the world a better place. The App Store has been a bit like a super flee market where all selling takes place. Very crowded, hard to find things, poor quality next to high quality. It seems that steps are being taken to make the App Store more like a large mall. Different stores for categories of apps. But more is needed. Perhaps a “mall” concept with “shopkeepers” outside of Apple but curating a “store front” in the App Store would be a significant step forward in helping people find the best and most appropriate apps for their particular needs. I doubt Apple or Google can really solve the App Store problem without such “store fronts.”

  8. Bazz
    Posted March 5, 2013 at 5:28 am | Permalink

    The problem is biggness — no time to do the analysis of an app!

    The solution was made by Cringley’s son some months back!

    Let the market speak by demanding their money back — that would sort the chaff from the seeds.

  9. David Dwyer
    Posted March 5, 2013 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Are you still alive? After your disasterous leadership at Apple surprised you would even dare to recommend anything.

  10. Jean-Louis Gassée
    Posted March 5, 2013 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    @ David Dwyer: Thanks for sharing your views. In this comments section, please focus on ideas, not personal attacks. And be specific vs. vague generalities.

  11. Posted March 6, 2013 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Masterful. So many opportunities to do this in many categories on the web itself.

  12. Pete
    Posted March 7, 2013 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    I can see the lawsuits coming.

    “I bought a bunch of apps specifically recommended by Apple. However, my buddy told showed me better apps for every single one of them. Now I want triple damages.”

  13. Edward
    Posted March 9, 2013 at 8:36 am | Permalink

    What about basic search, if you are at Amazon and type in a misspelled author or title, Amazon will figure out the correct spelling (does depend on severity), Apple will do a database look up as is and return no results even if you only mistyped one letter. It’d be great if Apple developed a search engine for all the products they offer, they sell so many items today, isn’t it worthwhile to do so?

  14. Posted May 7, 2013 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    I seldom leave remarks, but i did some searching and wound up here Google

  15. Posted May 21, 2013 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Post writing is also a excitement, if you be acquainted with afterward you can write
    otherwise it is complex to write.

9 Trackbacks

  1. [...] president of the Apple Products Division Jean-Louis Gassee has written an interesting blog post bemoaning the lack of App Store curation. The post will find a sympathetic ear from anyone who has [...]

  2. By iWyre on March 4, 2013 at 8:58 pm

    [...] president of the Apple Products Division Jean-Louis Gassee has written an interesting blog post bemoaning the lack of App Store curation. The post will find a sympathetic ear from anyone who has [...]

  3. [...] boss of a Apple Products Division Jean-Louis Gassee has written an engaging blog post bemoaning a miss of App Store curation. The post will find a sensitive ear from any one who has [...]

  4. [...] president of the Apple Products Division Jean-Louis Gassee has written an interesting blog post bemoaning the lack of App Store curation. The post will find a sympathetic ear [...]

  5. [...] president of the Apple Products Division Jean-Louis Gassee has written an interesting blog post bemoaning the lack of App Store curation. The post will find a sympathetic ear from anyone who has [...]

  6. By Technable | Making you Technically Able on March 5, 2013 at 2:00 pm

    [...] president of the Apple Products Division Jean-Louis Gassee has written an interesting blog post bemoaning the lack of App Store curation. The post will find a sympathetic ear from anyone who has [...]

  7. [...] president of the Apple Products Division Jean-Louis Gassee has written an interesting blog post bemoaning the lack of App Store curation. The post will find a sympathetic ear from anyone who has [...]

  8. [...] [toread] Google’s Red Guide to the Android App Store | Monday Note – [...]

  9. [...] отдела продукции Apple Jean-Louis Gassee написал пост, в котором выражает свое недовольство относительно [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*